0
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it provides conclusions that are logically certain, provided the premises are true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are valid, the conclusion must also be valid, leading to definitive outcomes. In contrast, inductive reasoning draws generalizations based on specific observations, which may lead to probable but not guaranteed conclusions. This inherent uncertainty makes inductive reasoning weaker in terms of certainty.
What else can I help you with?
Does Deductive reasoning requires that a person start with a specific example?
No, deductive reasoning does not require starting with a specific example. Instead, it begins with general principles or premises and derives specific conclusions from them. The process involves applying established rules or facts to reach a logical conclusion, moving from the general to the specific. Thus, the focus is on the logical relationships between statements rather than specific instances.
Is a diamond stronger than steel?
Yes. Actually... a diamond is NOT 'stronger' than steel. A diamond is 'harder' than steel, but it is not stronger.
Which scientific ideas did bacon dispute?
Francis Bacon disputed the reliance on Aristotelian philosophy and the deductive reasoning prevalent in his time. He criticized the tendency to rely on established authorities and advocated for empirical observation and experimentation as the basis for knowledge. Bacon emphasized the importance of the scientific method and inductive reasoning, arguing that knowledge should be derived from practical experience rather than abstract theorization. This shift laid the groundwork for modern scientific inquiry.
Why is a subjective reasoning not an example of a scientific thought?
A subjective reasoning is based on how you feel about something more than an actual fact. A scientific thought is emotionless and based on pure facts.
Why is a dry paper towel stronger than a wet one?
It is stronger because naturally when things are wet they are weaker.
Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Deductive reasoning is stronger than inductive reasoning because it?
draws conclusions based on premises everyone can agree on
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
What is inductive and deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning moves from the general details to the specific details Deductive reasoning is reasoning from the specific details to the general details
True or false Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning?
FALSE
How is inductive reasoning weaker than deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it involves making generalizations based on specific observations, which can lead to errors or false conclusions. In contrast, deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and uses it to make specific predictions or draw specific conclusions, which can be more reliable and conclusive when executed correctly.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
What is deductive reasonings?
Deductive reasoning is when you base a conjecture on statements that are assumed to be true.general to specific
How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or data, while deductive reasoning involves reaching specific conclusions based on general principles or premises. Inductive reasoning is less certain than deductive reasoning because the conclusions are not logically guaranteed by the premises.
