Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence gathered through scientific experimentation and investigations
Observation,experimentation,reasoning,implementation
Carrying out scientific investigations is crucial for expanding our understanding of the natural world and addressing complex problems. These investigations allow researchers to test hypotheses, gather evidence, and develop theories based on empirical data. Moreover, scientific investigations drive innovation, inform public policy, and contribute to advancements in healthcare, technology, and environmental sustainability. Ultimately, they foster critical thinking and informed decision-making in society.
When new evidence contradicts a scientific theory, the scientific community typically evaluates the validity of the evidence and the theory itself. If the evidence is robust and replicable, it may lead to a revision or replacement of the existing theory to better explain the observed phenomena. This process is fundamental to the scientific method, promoting the evolution of knowledge as new information emerges. A theory may not be discarded immediately but rather refined to accommodate new insights.
Controlled evidence refers to information or data that is collected under specific conditions that minimize variables and biases, ensuring reliability and validity. This type of evidence is often used in scientific experiments and research studies, where researchers control factors to isolate the effects of a particular variable. The goal is to produce replicable results that can be confidently used to support conclusions or hypotheses.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence gathered through scientific experimentation and investigations
An alternate spelling of the word empircal. In the case of evidence, it is evidence that has been proven true over and over (replicable) using the scientific method - observation, experimentation, analysis.
Observation,experimentation,reasoning,implementation
The parts of scientific investigation are identifying a research question or problem, forming a hypothesis, gathering evidence, analyzing evidence.
Nobody really knows! Throughout history - mankind has been fascinated with the idea of ghosts, but solid scientific - in other words "replicable" evidence is lacking.
Psychologists use the scientific method to gather empirical evidence, test hypotheses, and draw conclusions based on data. It helps ensure that their findings are reliable, valid, and replicable, contributing to the credibility and advancement of the field.
Scientific laws are concise descriptions of a wide variety of observations based on empirical evidence. Observations are the data and information collected through experiments and studies that form the basis for scientific laws. Together, scientific laws and observations help to explain and predict natural phenomena in a systematic and replicable way.
logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
I'm not sure what "hypothisess" means. Did you mean "hypotheses"? Hypotheses are proposed explanations for a phenomenon that can be tested through research and observation. They are important in scientific inquiry as they help guide investigations and draw conclusions based on evidence.
Yes, the investigations and the evidence found are real. As in many scientific endeavors, the interpretation of what the data means may be subjective.
Investigations of what? The best response to this question I can provide is that they follow the evidence.