0
What else can I help you with?
What is natural selection also known as?
Survival of the fittest
What is meant by this statement Natural selection is an editing mechanism rather than a creative process?
Possible nothing. Natural selection produces combinatorial genes that work in amazing ways incrementally. The vertebrate eye, for instance. Naturally, those organisms that do not reproduce successfully are ' edited ', but selection works on the molecular level to make organisms not only fit, but fit enough.
What statement does NOT accurately describe natural selection?
Notably, the phrase 'survival of the fittest' is a particularly poor choice of words for describing natural selection, in my opinion. Mainly because, in the perception of the layman, it might be taken to mean that natural selection is a black-and-white phenomenon, always favouring more able variants, and that ability (fitness) is measured in terms of health, strength, intelligence, rather than ability to produce offspring. A far more accurate phrase would be: differential reproductive success - meaning the difference in numbers of surviving fertile offspring between variants.
How has natural selection affected humans?
Natural Selection Natural Selection Natural selection is the differential survival and reproduction of individuals due to differences in phenotype. It is a key mechanism of evolution, the change in the heritable traits characteristic of a population over generations. Charles Darwin popularised the term "natural selection", contrasting it with artificial selection, which in his view is intentional, whereas natural selection is not.
What was Darwins catchphrase for the gradual evolution of new species?
Darwin didn't have a catchphrase for this, as far as I am aware. A famous catchphrase for natural selection that was coined by Herbert Spencer and used by Charles Darwin is "survival of the fittest". Unfortunately this catchphrase does a rather poor job of portraying the principle of differential reproductive success.
Why does natural selection work on organisms phenotypes rather than their genotypes?
This is backward, natural selection works on genotype not phenotype.
Why does natural selection act on phenotype rather than genotype of an organism?
This seems to be an odd question to ask... Unless I'm mistaken, the phenotype of a given organism is governed by its genotype, and changed a fair amount by the organism's environment. Consider the following circumstances: Organism A has a long set of arms, and has a "long arm" allele. Organism B has short arms and a "short arm" allele. For example, A's genotype has the "long arm" allele, and seen in its phenotype it has long arms. The converse is true for B. Judging by your usage of technical terms in your question, I'm sure I don't need to tell you that A will out-compete B, assuming they are in a food-is-up-high environment. So, A will end up with more offspring than B, again assuming that A and B are members of different species. Eventually organism A will become prevalent, and natural selection will have caused there to be more organisms with the "long arms" phenotype, and the "long arm" allele in their genotype. In summation, Genotype governs Phenotype, and the best geno- and phenotypes will be chosen by natural selection. By an organism having a superior phenotype, it also has a superior genotype.
Which of the following statements about a gene that shows maternal effect inheritance is true?
A gene that shows maternal effect inheritance is one where the phenotype of the offspring is determined by the genotype of the mother, rather than the offspring's own genotype. This means that even if the offspring carries a certain genetic variant, it will only display the phenotype associated with the mother's genotype.
Dominance that occurs whenever the hybrid genotype produces a new intermediate phenotype?
When a heterozygous genotype (two different alleles) results in an intermediate phenotype, this is either codominance or incomplete dominance. If it is codominance, then both alleles are expressed together in the phenotype. If it is incomplete dominance, the two alleles produce a blended phenotype rather than both alleles being expressed together.
Why does natural selection act on the phenotypes rather than the genotypes of an organism?
This seems to be an odd question to ask... Unless I'm mistaken, the phenotype of a given organism is governed by its genotype, and changed a fair amount by the organism's environment. Consider the following circumstances: Organism A has a long set of arms, and has a "long arm" allele. Organism B has short arms and a "short arm" allele. For example, A's genotype has the "long arm" allele, and seen in its phenotype it has long arms. The converse is true for B. Judging by your usage of technical terms in your question, I'm sure I don't need to tell you that A will out-compete B, assuming they are in a food-is-up-high environment. So, A will end up with more offspring than B, again assuming that A and B are members of different species. Eventually organism A will become prevalent, and natural selection will have caused there to be more organisms with the "long arms" phenotype, and the "long arm" allele in their genotype. In summation, Genotype governs Phenotype, and the best geno- and phenotypes will be chosen by natural selection. By an organism having a superior phenotype, it also has a superior genotype.
What are variations in terms of evolution?
Normally variations might be differences in genotype between individuals. However, in evolution, the genotype isn't important; rather, the phenotype is what interacts with the environment. In other words, two organisms can have different genotypes (seeming variation), but be equally fit to survive because their phenotypes are the same. Therefore, variation in an evolutionary sense would be differences in phenotype, the outward appearance or function of a trait.
Which is an example of imcomplete dominance?
An example of incomplete dominance is when crossing a red flower with a white flower produces pink flowers in the offspring, rather than a blend of the two parent colors. This occurs when the heterozygous genotype results in an intermediate phenotype that is different from either homozygous genotype.
What is it when the presence of two different alleles results in an intermediate?
When a heterozygous genotype (two different alleles) results in an intermediate phenotype, this is either codominance or incomplete dominance. If it is codominance, then both alleles are expressed together in the phenotype. If it is incomplete dominance, the two alleles produce a blended phenotype rather than both alleles being expressed together.
Why does natural selection does not act directly on genes?
The natural selection process is a gradual one and is found to pose a gradual effect on the genes because the nitrogenous base bonds in the genes are not an easy task to alter and the hydrogen bonds existing between these bases would change according to change in the environmental barriers that arise out of catastrophes to which the selection has to incur. So the gradual modification is found to be observed in the level of genes in case of natural selection in animals. This was the case for Galapogous island finches in case of Darwinian studies in natural selection. The genotype variations are the gradual ones leading to changes in the phenotype of the organisms.
How is natural selection and evolution linked?
Natural selection is the process by which certain traits that provide a reproductive advantage become more common in a population over time, leading to evolutionary change. Evolution is the overall change in a population's genetic makeup over successive generations, driven by mechanisms such as natural selection. In essence, natural selection is one of the primary mechanisms through which evolution occurs.
Is combinations of alleles known as a genotype?
Yes, a combination of alleles that an individual has for a particular gene is known as their genotype. This genetic code determines the traits and characteristics of an individual, based on the expression of those alleles.
Is it true or false that a natural selection acts on phenotypes not genotypes?
It doesn't. Phenotypes are viable or not in a given environment, and this influences whether the corresponding genotypes get passed on. Selection works on genotypes via the effects of their expression, their phenotype. The answer you may be looking for is that phenotypes maladapted to their environment have less babies, and pass on less copies of their genes. "Natural selection" is the whole process over generations. "Selection" may refer to misadapted bodies/phenotypes reproducing less due to illness, hunger, bad quality territories, dying earlier, etc.
