0
A scientist may reject a scientific theory if new evidence emerges that contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. If repeated experiments or observations consistently yield results that the theory cannot explain, it may be deemed insufficient or inaccurate. Additionally, if a more robust and comprehensive theory is developed that better accounts for the data, the original theory may be abandoned. Ultimately, scientific progress relies on the willingness to revise or discard theories in light of new findings.
What else can I help you with?
What is a valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific therory?
A scientist might reject a scientific theory if new empirical evidence contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. For instance, if experimental results consistently show outcomes that the theory cannot explain or predict accurately, this would undermine its validity. Additionally, if a theory fails to account for a significant body of existing data or if a more comprehensive alternative theory emerges, a scientist may deem it necessary to reject the original theory.
Can you become a scientist without school?
yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ==== You can certainly undertake scientific experiments and pursuits on your own, if you have the mind for it, but in order to get a job in a scientific field, you would need a degree.
How is a prediction used in scientific method?
In scientific method, hypothesis is the scientific prediction the scientist does. He/she gives an educated guess as to what's going to happen during the experiment then would say if its been proven or not at the conclusion.
Is an every day theory and a scientific theory the same?
No. A scientific theory is a proven set of rules describing reality. The "everyday" usage of the word is what a scientist would call a hypothesis, and others would call an unsubstantiated guess.
How can you be qualified to become a scientist?
It depends what kind of scientist you want to be. I'm from New Zealand and here, most of the time, you will need to study at university for a Bachelor of Science. This still probably doesn't qualify you as an actual "scientist" but you would be able to get a job in a scientific industry. You could also get lower level scientific jobs by going to college or polytech.
What is a valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific therory?
A scientist might reject a scientific theory if new empirical evidence contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. For instance, if experimental results consistently show outcomes that the theory cannot explain or predict accurately, this would undermine its validity. Additionally, if a theory fails to account for a significant body of existing data or if a more comprehensive alternative theory emerges, a scientist may deem it necessary to reject the original theory.
Why would a scientist a spreadsheet?
to keep track of scientific chemicals!
How did scientist before the scientist revolution do their work?
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
How do you write 4.8 in scientific notation?
It is scientific as is. i.e. no scientist would complicate this. However, you could add 4.8x100
What is scientific about hiking?
When a trained scientist makes a careful observation of anything, that qualifies as a scientific observation. Scientific variables would be quantities of something,
Would you consider a doctor a scientific career?
Yes a medical doctor is a scientist.
How would a scientist write 93 million?
It is: 9.3*107 in scientific notation
What could be a reason why a scientist might reject a peer review for publication?
if he is smarter than his peers. Albert Einstein would be an example
In which step of the scientific method would a scientist determine the specific variables of the experiment?
Observation.
How did scientist before the scientific revolution do their work?
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
What special skills would you need to be a scientist?
quick thinking and be able to understand the scientific vocabulary
What would a scientist do with the information gathered during the experimental process?
use it based on the scientific method.
