Yes, as long as the explanation is modified by new evidence.
Yes, it is possible for ideas initially regarded as pseudoscience to later gain scientific support. This can occur if new evidence, methodologies, or technologies emerge that validate the claims previously dismissed. Historical examples include concepts like plate tectonics and the germ theory of disease, which were once met with skepticism but are now well-established scientific principles. The distinction often lies in the willingness to adapt and rigorously test ideas against empirical evidence.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
No. Pseudoscience is a belief or practice which claim to be scientific but have not yet proved it. For instance, some people consider Astrology or Psychic Powers to pseudoscience (personally, I feel astrology is not pseudo science). Physics IS a scientific practice and has been proved throughout history.
It is not a bad thing when your hypothesis is not supported, because this shows science working as it should. Something has been learned, and a possible explanation for an effect can be taken off the table, for the most part. The statement is qualified because researchers can now consider whether or not the right controls were put into place, or whether or not there is a more basic flaw in the design of the experiment. If everything is in order, the search for an other explanation gets underway.
The hypothesis must be able to be proved true or false.
Yes, it is possible for ideas initially regarded as pseudoscience to later gain scientific support. This can occur if new evidence, methodologies, or technologies emerge that validate the claims previously dismissed. Historical examples include concepts like plate tectonics and the germ theory of disease, which were once met with skepticism but are now well-established scientific principles. The distinction often lies in the willingness to adapt and rigorously test ideas against empirical evidence.
Yes, it is possible to change your feelings towards something you initially dislike through exposure, open-mindedness, and effort.
Alchemists in ancient times believed it was possible to change lead into gold through a process called transmutation. However, this belief has been debunked by modern science as a pseudoscience, as it is not possible to change one element into another in this manner.
it is the science which deals with the study of palm of the hand
Think of possible answers that could relate to the job you are interviewing for. Perhaps there is something fascinating about this industry that initially made you interested in it?
Supported for what? You must give as much background information as possible in your question. It is not always possible to read between the lines of a vague question, but we do our best.
There is no scientific evidence to support the claim of "rice pulling" property in non-metals. This concept is often tied to pseudoscience and fraudulent practices. Non-metals do not possess any inherent property that can attract rice or any other material.
The chance of something happening.
Yes. It is possible to make something like a nerve gear.
Yes, it is possible for something to be infinite, such as the universe or certain mathematical concepts like numbers.
something to occupy but not mass is solid
He is about 30 something or 40 something.