no,not all countries have enough food to produce
Any given country does not necessarily have to produce all of its own food, since it is possible to import food from other countries which produce more food than they eat. However, in order to import food it takes money, and that money is obtained by selling something. A nation that has a healthy economy, therefore, does not face starvation. If they have any substantial exports, they can use the resulting income to buy food, even if farming conditions in that country do not allow enough food to be grown to feed the local population. Thus, Libya grows very little food, but it exports oil, so the Libyans do not starve. But Somalia grows little food and also has no real exports, so it does starve.
Yes, otherwise we would have no agricultural development and then as a result of that the economy will collapse and then we will all be in a financial crisis.. but even if we didn't we would still need the supply of other resources from other countries as not all countries can produce every resource.
Food crops are grown in various locations throughout the Western Hemisphere, including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina. These countries have diverse climates and agricultural conditions that support the cultivation of a wide range of food crops such as corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, fruits, and vegetables.
The all-or-none principle in physiology states that once a nerve impulse reaches a certain threshold, a neuron will fire at its maximum potential. If the stimulus is strong enough to trigger an action potential, the response will occur at full strength. If the stimulus is below the threshold, no response will be triggered.
If you are refering to beaches on oceans, then no, not all countries have beaches. Some countries are landlocked, which means that they are completely surrounded by other countries, and their borders do not touch an ocean or a connecting sea.
Yes, organic farming could produce enough food for all, though not all would agree with that.
No because all the floods they have wash away all of their crops.
Not all civilizations have the ability to produce surplus food. Factors such as environmental conditions, technology, and social organization can influence a civilization's capacity for food production. Some civilizations may struggle to produce enough food to meet their needs, while others may have surplus food that allows for trade or the support of a larger population.
No. Animals do not produce food, they consume it.
All organisms that can not produce their own food, are called heterotrophs.
All plants that produce their own food, but a mushroom cannot produce their own food.
All green plants produce food ande oxygen
All life will cease shortly after due to lack of food unless we can somehow harness cyanobacteria to produce enough food for all life on the planet, except plants of course.
There isn't enough food because Japesh ate it all.
The same way all plants produce food. Photosynthesis.
If you agree that biomass is the leftovers from growing your own food, dead plants and animals and what is known as sewerage in some countries then most parts of this planet have the natural resources to produce biomass but I would ask how many countries make use of the biomass they do have instead of throwing it all on a rubbish tip.
As a consumer, you are free to buy what you wish. If you prefer food without additives, you can buy that kind of food. Health food stores specialize in it. If enough consumers insisted on that kind of food, then that is what all the stores would sell, and all the producers would produce. The free market responds to supply and demand.