answersLogoWhite

0

it gave them the advantage because most people in Kansas were for slavery

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Geography

What was the free-state capital of Kansas?

Lawrence, Kansas served as the free-state capital during the time of Bleeding Kansas in the 1850s. It was a stronghold for anti-slavery settlers and played a key role in the fight against pro-slavery forces in the region.


What advantage did the geographic position of tenochtitlan offer the Aztecs in the defense of their capital?

Tenochtitlan was situated on an island in Lake Texcoco, making it naturally protected by water, which served as a barrier against potential invaders. The Aztecs were able to control access to the city through causeways connecting it to the mainland, allowing them to regulate entry and defend against attacks. The city's location also provided a strategic advantage as the surrounding lake made it difficult for enemy forces to siege or surround Tenochtitlan effectively.


Which city-state seemed to have the geographical advantage why?

It was located by the sea and connected to its port by walls. This meant that when under attack it could defend its city with minimum resources, leaving it free to send out sea expeditionary forces to harass the cities of its land attackers. This uninterrupted access to the sea also allowed it to trade, import food and fish.


Who employed the military strategy of using the local geography to their advantage?

Military leaders throughout history, such as Hannibal Barca and Sun Tzu, have employed the strategy of using the local geography to their advantage in warfare. By leveraging natural terrain features like mountains, rivers, and forests, they could control the battlefield, ambush enemy forces, and gain strategic advantages in combat.


Which city state seemed to have the geographical advantage why?

It was located by the sea and connected to its port by walls. This meant that when under attack it could defend its city with minimum resources, leaving it free to send out sea expeditionary forces to harass the cities of its land attackers. This uninterrupted access to the sea also allowed it to trade, import food and fish.

Related Questions

Why did pro slavery forces attack Lawrence Kansas?

Pro-slavery forces attacked Lawrence, Kansas in 1856 in an attempt to suppress the anti-slavery movement in the region and intimidate its residents. The town was seen as a stronghold of free-soilers and abolitionists, making it a target for pro-slavery forces seeking to exert control over the territory.


Why were people living in Kansas so divided on the issue of slavery?

Pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces fought for control of the territory because it had not yet been decided if Kansas would become a free or slave state.


In the 1850s, the territory of Kansas became known as "Bleeding Kansas" after violence erupted between abolitionists and those who were pro-slavery. Why were people living in Kansas so divided on the issue of slavery?

Pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces fought for control of the territory because it had not yet been decided if Kansas would become a free or slave state.


Why were attempts to organize the Kansas territory politically difficult?

Prior to Kansas joining the Union, the Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers. Kansas was known as Bleeding Kansas as these forces collided over the issue of slavery in the United States.


What led the newspapers to speak of Bleeding Kansas in 1856?

The term "Bleeding Kansas" was coined in 1856 to describe the violent conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the Kansas Territory. The struggle over whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state led to widespread bloodshed and turmoil, capturing national attention and earning the territory its bloody nickname.


Why did Kansas become a battleground between pro slavery and anti slavery?

Kansas became a battleground between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed the residents of the territories to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This led to violent confrontations between supporters and opponents of slavery, as both sides sought to influence the outcome of the territory's decision on slavery.


How could the forces of globalization help stop slavery?

The forces of globalization are the CAUSE OF SLAVERY. Wake up doofus!


Did Kansas-Nebraska Act led bloodshed over slavery in Kansas?

Yes, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 played a significant role in escalating tensions over slavery in Kansas. The act allowed for popular sovereignty in deciding the issue of slavery in the territory, leading to violent conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces known as "Bleeding Kansas."


A major advantage of the American side in the revolutionary war?

The patriot forces were fighting on their own territory, making their fight skills more effective because they were more familiar with their area.


What was the nickname given to the violence led by john brown that erupted in the kansas territory?

Prior to Kansas joining the Union, the Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers. Kansas was known as Bleeding Kansas as these forces collided over the issue of slavery in the United States. The term "Bleeding Kansas" was coined by Republican Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune.


What name was given to the fight between proslavery and anti-slavery forces following the passage of the Kansas Nebrask act?

Prior to Kansas joining the Union, the Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers. Kansas was known as Bleeding Kansas as these forces collided over the issue of slavery in the United States. The term "Bleeding Kansas" was coined by Republican Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune.


What led newspaper to speak of Bleeding Kansas in 1856?

fighting between pro-slavery and antislavery forces