the advantages are.........
there are loads more points
but these are some useful ones
The advantages for a country that has a lot of land are that there would be more population, more farming, more space for wildlife preserves, lots of houses, maybe some more parks, more exploration, and more money.
Well, a high population density isn't really good at all. Alot of Canada and our world aren't even used at all. And almost all the people that live in Canada are crammed into Ontario, giving us the highest population density in the country, yet if you look to Prince Edward Island, the population is about 75,000 people more than Northwest Territories and Nunavut combined, yet NWT and Nunavut cover almost a third of Canada's land. But on the bright side, it can help a city get on the CMA list (Census Metropolitan Area), which is a city over 100,00 people. And it does help with industrialization and the further urbanization of our world.
As of 2021, the Vatican City is the smallest country in terms of population, with a population of around 800 people. On the other hand, China has the largest population, with over 1.4 billion people.
Asia has the highest population density among all continents, with countries such as Bangladesh, India, and Japan having some of the highest population densities in the world.
Europe has a population of around 750 million people, making it the third most populous continent after Asia and Africa. Europe has a relatively high population density compared to other continents, with many countries having large urban areas and developed infrastructure.
China has a population of 1,344,130,000 India has a population of 1,241,491,960
The moon has a remarkably low population density.
Malta
Arunachal Pradesh
Stronger economics in country.
Having a high population density means that there are more people living in a certain distance, for example Japan would have a higher population density if 1000 people lived in an area of 1 km squared. The higher the number, the higher the population density.
The advantages for a country that has a lot of land are that there would be more population, more farming, more space for wildlife preserves, lots of houses, maybe some more parks, more exploration, and more money.
Two disadvantages of having a low population density are limited economic opportunities and inadequate infrastructure. With fewer people, there may be less demand for goods and services, leading to fewer businesses and job opportunities. Additionally, maintaining infrastructure like roads, healthcare, and education can be challenging and costly, as the spread-out population may not justify the investment needed for efficient services.
Well, a high population density isn't really good at all. Alot of Canada and our world aren't even used at all. And almost all the people that live in Canada are crammed into Ontario, giving us the highest population density in the country, yet if you look to Prince Edward Island, the population is about 75,000 people more than Northwest Territories and Nunavut combined, yet NWT and Nunavut cover almost a third of Canada's land. But on the bright side, it can help a city get on the CMA list (Census Metropolitan Area), which is a city over 100,00 people. And it does help with industrialization and the further urbanization of our world.
India has the highest population of Hindus
Asia has the highest population density of any continent, with countries like India, Bangladesh, Japan, and South Korea having some of the highest population densities in the world.
As of 2021, Libya has a population density of around 4 people per square kilometer. The majority of Libya's population is concentrated along the coast, with vast desert regions in the interior having very low population density.