Africa and South America
The continents with the most obvious fit of coastlines are Africa and South America. This is known as the theory of continental drift, where it is believed that these continents were once connected as part of the supercontinent Pangaea. The coastlines of these two continents appear to fit together like pieces of a puzzle, providing evidence for the theory of plate tectonics.
There are two basic evidences to support this theory: 1. Animals or plants of the same species can be found on separated continents (for example, Africa and Australia or North America and Europe) naturally, and have not been placed by man. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, allowing the animals and plants to disperse. 2. The continents all seem to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, but have since broken off and their coastlines have eroded since then, which explains why they do not perfectly fit together.
Fossil evidence of the same species found on multiple continents. Matching geological formations across continents, such as mountain ranges. Similar rock formations and ages of rocks on different continents. Paleoclimatic evidence, like glacial deposits in areas that are now far from the poles. Fit of continental shelf margins, where coastlines align when continents are pieced together.
Africa and South America have coastlines that appear to fit together, giving rise to the theory of continental drift and the concept of plate tectonics. This fit is most evident along the Atlantic Ocean.
You mean like Africa and South America? (grin). At one time, they did fit together. The constant movement of earths tectonic plates has caused them to move into their current positions - which are constantly changing, too. thank you a lot
Evidence supporting the theory of the supercontinent Pangaea includes the jigsaw-like fit of continents, similarities in rock formations and mountain ranges across continents that align when continents are brought together, distribution of fossils of identical species across distant continents, and similarities in ancient climates and geological records found on separate continents. These pieces of evidence work together to suggest that the current continents were once part of a single landmass.
The continents with the most obvious fit of coastlines are Africa and South America. This is known as the theory of continental drift, where it is believed that these continents were once connected as part of the supercontinent Pangaea. The coastlines of these two continents appear to fit together like pieces of a puzzle, providing evidence for the theory of plate tectonics.
There are two basic evidences to support this theory: 1. Animals or plants of the same species can be found on separated continents (for example, Africa and Australia or North America and Europe) naturally, and have not been placed by man. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, allowing the animals and plants to disperse. 2. The continents all seem to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, but have since broken off and their coastlines have eroded since then, which explains why they do not perfectly fit together.
1. The continents look like puzzle pieces that should fit together (maybe they did in the past). 2. Fossils and geographic layers found on the coast lines of continents (especially South America and Africa) matched up.
Fossil evidence of the same species found on multiple continents. Matching geological formations across continents, such as mountain ranges. Similar rock formations and ages of rocks on different continents. Paleoclimatic evidence, like glacial deposits in areas that are now far from the poles. Fit of continental shelf margins, where coastlines align when continents are pieced together.
Africa and South America have coastlines that appear to fit together, giving rise to the theory of continental drift and the concept of plate tectonics. This fit is most evident along the Atlantic Ocean.
There are two basic evidences to support this theory: 1. Animals or plants of the same species can be found on separated continents (for example, Africa and Australia or North America and Europe) naturally, and have not been placed by man. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, allowing the animals and plants to disperse. 2. The continents all seem to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, but have since broken off and their Coastlines have eroded since then, which explains why they do not perfectly fit together.
You mean like Africa and South America? (grin). At one time, they did fit together. The constant movement of earths tectonic plates has caused them to move into their current positions - which are constantly changing, too. thank you a lot
Africa and Europe have coastlines that fit together snugly, leading some researchers to propose the idea of a single supercontinent, known as Afro-Eurasia. This is based on the matching shapes of the coastlines on the eastern boundary of the Atlantic Ocean.
Africa and South America have coastlines that appear to fit together, particularly along the bulge of Brazil and West Africa. This observation supports the theory of continental drift and the idea that these two continents were once connected as part of the supercontinent Pangea.
They would fit roughly together but not perfectly due to years and years of erosion. As evident as Africa and So. America are that they were once joined. Erosion does not work. Even with that they will not fit. Try it with cut outs. But shrink the size of the earths sphere to about 1/2 its size today and they fit perfect.
Africa and South America have coastlines that fit together like puzzle pieces, particularly along the western edges where the continents appear to have once been connected before drifting apart. This phenomenon is known as continental drift and provides evidence for the theory of plate tectonics.