A world map or globe would be the best tool for seeing the sizes of Earth's continents. Both provide a visual representation of the size and shape of continents in relation to one another.
A Mercator projection map would be useful for comparing the sizes of continents as it preserves the shapes of continents but distorts their sizes, making it easier to visually compare.
A globe because the projection on a map is always distorted.
The contry that has two continents is Russia. The two continents in Russia are Europe and Asia. By the way you could have googled "The seven continents of the world" in images it would have been much quicker.
The contry that has two continents is Russia. The two continents in Russia are Europe and Asia. By the way you could have googled "The seven continents of the world" in images it would have been much quicker.
A choropleth map would be best for quickly seeing which country had the most people. This type of map uses different colors to represent different quantities, making it easy to visually compare population sizes across countries.
A Mercator projection map would be useful for comparing the sizes of continents as it preserves the shapes of continents but distorts their sizes, making it easier to visually compare.
you will find it in earths mantle because it is a kind of an igneous rock
They didn't. If you take out all the water from the seas and ocean, you would see the continents are still connected by land (save for the faults). Unless the tectonic plates were reduced to the incredibly small sizes therefore allowing them to shift like you are misled to believe, there is no chance of the continents shifting as they are all part of the ground, not floating.
A globe because the projection on a map is always distorted.
You would find a tortoise on all continents except Antarctica.
Without continuous mountain formation, erosion would gradually wear down existing mountains to create flatter landscapes. Eventually, the continents would become more level over time, with mountains turning into hills and plains.
There would be no land
They would fit roughly together but not perfectly due to years and years of erosion. As evident as Africa and So. America are that they were once joined. Erosion does not work. Even with that they will not fit. Try it with cut outs. But shrink the size of the earths sphere to about 1/2 its size today and they fit perfect.
The edges of some continents look as if they would fit together like pieces of a puzzle.
There would be an infinite number of possible sizes.
No, the oceans do not contain enough salt to cover all of the continents with a layer 50 feet thick. The average salt content in the oceans is about 3.5%, and there is not enough salt to form a layer that thick on the continents.
Mercury (smallest), Mars, Venus, Earth, Neptune, Uranus, Saturn and Jupiter (largest). Note that although Neptune has more mass than Uranus, it is smaller in size. Mercury's volume = 0.056 x Earths Mars' volume = 0.151 x Earths Venus' volume = 0.857 x Earths (Earth) volume = 1 x Earths Neptune's volume = 57.74 x Earths Uranus' volume = 63.086 x Earths Saturn's volume = 763.59 x Earths Jupiter's volume = 1321.3 x Earths