they are more likely to have individuals with an adaption
In 2000 the population of Homestead, Florida was 31,909. In 2010 the population was 52,301, which is over 65 percent more than 2000, which is good growth percent for this town.
As of the last census in 2011, the population of Braunston-in-Rutland was around 67 residents. Please note that population numbers can fluctuate, so it's a good idea to check for the most recent data if needed.
As of 2021, the estimated population of Cleveland, TN, is around 45,446. Keep in mind that population figures can change due to various factors, so it's always good to check with the latest data sources for the most up-to-date information.
The law of population, proposed by Thomas Malthus, suggests that population growth tends to outpace the growth of resources, leading to inevitable checks on population such as famine, disease, or war. Malthus argued that these checks were necessary to prevent overpopulation and maintain a balance between population and resources.
The best location for a capital city would depend on factors such as geographic centrality, accessibility, natural resources, and infrastructure. However, many consider a location that is centrally located within a country, has good transportation networks, and is easily defensible to be ideal for a capital city. Additionally, a location that is politically neutral and represents the diversity of the country's population can also be considered advantageous.
I recommend reading about "Survival of Fittest" and "Natural Selection" to answer your question. The answer to this question is VERY big. Well, if you want the simplest answer, diversity and selection of good traits within the population.
A population bottleneck (or genetic bottleneck) is an evolutionary event in which a significant percentage of a population or species is killed or otherwise prevented from reproducing. This reduces the genetic diversity of the population, and even if the population bounces back in size, it can often show evidence of the past bottleneck by lacking significant variation for its size. A good example is that of the cheetah, whose current population shows almost negligible variation. Humans are not currently experiencing any genetic bottlenecking because the population is increasing. However, there is evidence suggesting that the human population underwent one or more bottlenecks in the past, since its overall genetic diversity is relatively low for its size.
Random fertilization. All the eggs and sperm produced are variations due to crossing over alone, not even considering other processes. The meet and fertilization occurs randomly insuring a good mix of genetic variation. Thus, genetic diversity.
A good mutation can lead to beneficial traits that help organisms survive and reproduce better in their environment, increasing their chances of passing on these advantageous genes to future generations. This can contribute to evolutionary adaptation by improving the overall fitness of a population. Additionally, good mutations can increase genetic diversity within a population, providing a wider range of traits for natural selection to act upon, ultimately enhancing the resilience and adaptability of the species.
Genetic recombination is a key process that allows for the exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes, leading to genetic diversity and the creation of unique combinations of alleles.
Lack of diversity (inbreeding) exposing genetic weaknesses. A good example would be pedigree dogs.
Founder's effect is a type of genetic drift, a chance event that can disrupt the gene pool of a population. In this case, the gene pool is limited due to the similarity of genes shared within the group. These similarities are the result of a limited number of "founders" or individuals who started the population. A good example of founder's effect is the Amish population. A few individuals started the group and limited immigration and reproduction, which would have allowed for new combinations of genes to be added to the gene pool. Because of this lack of variation, the members of the population share many traits, thus resulting in decreased diversity.
Population growth and species survival.
Since it's sexual two organisms give a part of their DNA to put together and so the resulting organism gets some, not all, of the traits from both starting organism. This means that after sexual reproduction the new organism will always be different from others, but have some characteristics that are the same. The new combination of characteristics can either be bad or good and this will determine survival and weather or not the combination will be passed down.
Be careful with this, it is usually misinterpreted as survival of fittest individuals. Instead it is survival of fittest population via death of some individuals early. Individuals never evolve, they are fixed genetic snapshots in the movie of life, they simply live or die. Populations evolve.
Having a diversity of genes within a species increases the species' ability to adapt to changing environments and resist diseases. It allows for a broader range of traits and characteristics that can be advantageous in different situations, ultimately improving the overall genetic health of the population.
During good conditions, organisms can reproduce sexually and benefit from the genetic diversity that this creates. During harsh conditions, asexual reproduction can take place without having a partner and results in offspring that are identical to the parent. This means that if the parent can survive the harsh conditions, then the offspring are more likely to as well.