A globe is the only accurate way to represent the earth because it is 3-dimesional.
A flat map is two dimensional. A Globe is three dimensional. The Earth is three dimensional. If you try and express a three dimensional object using a two dimensional surface, you introduce distortions. A flat map has distortions, a globe is a truer representation.
When you looking at a globe or ball, you can only see on;e see one half of it as the rest is behind the visible area. It doesn't matter from which direction you look (top, bottom, any side), the part of the ball or globe you can see is half of the sphere, also called a hemisphere.
Globes were invented to give a more accurate depiction of the world. Previously, all there were maps, which not only distorted the size and shape of landmasses and oceans but also helped perpetuate the false assumption that the world was flat.
If globes only had latitude lines, it would be difficult to determine a location's east-west position. If globes only had longitude lines, it would be challenging to determine a location's north-south position. Both latitude and longitude lines are necessary for accurately pinpointing a location on the Earth's surface.
The reason they call the equator the great circle is because circles the whole earth in the middle.becase its the only line that runs in the centre of the earth and goes right arround . {nickstar}
a globe
Globe
Globe
It is impossible for a flat map to be as accurate as a globe. The Earth is round and only a round globe can put things in the correct perspective.
A flat map is two dimensional. A Globe is three dimensional. The Earth is three dimensional. If you try and express a three dimensional object using a two dimensional surface, you introduce distortions. A flat map has distortions, a globe is a truer representation.
It is not the most accurate but it is close enough for general use. The Earth is not a perfect sphere. But a globe is better than a flat map because the Earth is not flat. If you map only covers a very small part of the Earth then a flat map is usually good enough but if the map is to portray countries and continents then if it remains flat it will distort either distances or areas or angles.
the globe
Generally speaking, and if you are talking about representing the whole of earth's surface in one mapping, it would be a globe. But for many purposes a globe would have to be impractically large in order to match the precision of various other maps made for specialized purposes and covering smaller areas.
Only the surface.
Advantage of map: can see the whole area being examined Disadvantage of map: shapes are not accurate and scale is distorted Advantage of globe: accurate representation of shape and scale; relief is possible,axial tilt can be observed Disadvantage of globe: can't see whole area; has to be suspended, so can't observe details at poles
An advantage of a map is that a map is easy to carry. An advantage of a globe is that a globe is a 3D version of the world. A disadvantage of a map is that on a map the continents are stretched. A disadvantage of a globe is that a globe is hard to carry around.
The word is "distortion" and means the variance caused when trying to represent a three-dimensional surface (like the spherical surface of the Earth) in a two-dimensional form (a map). There is, of course, no way for a single flat surface to show exactly what a globe shows, and on a globe you can only see half of the surface at any one time.