Insurance companies are notrmally very specific about what they will and will not cover, the policy may only cover short term temporary disability - this does not mean the insurer has any obligations for longer term payouts, you need to read the policy carefully and if still unsure then ruing the insurere or broker that sold you the insurance
No. US code 38USC 5301: " Payments of benefits due or to become due under any law administered by the Secretary shall not be assignable except to the extent specifically authorized by law, and such payments made to, or on account of, a beneficiary shall be exempt from taxation, shall be exempt from the claim of creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable process whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary. The preceding sentence shall not apply to claims of the United States arising under such laws nor shall the exemption therein contained as to taxation extend to any property purchased in part or wholly out of such payments. The provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit the assignment of insurance otherwise authorized under chapter 19 of this title, or of servicemen's indemnity." VA disability as well as Social security is exempt.
Unless they can show you took money out of the accounts, you should not be liable. Typically the estate is responsible for paying the debts, including the medical bills of the deceased. If a child has co-signed any paperwork regarding medical procedures, they may be held liable.
In New Jersey the debts of the deceased are the responsibility of the estate. However, if one of the children was also a co-signer on any of the agreements they might also be responsible. Consult a probate attorney in your jurisdiction for help.
Yes. There are no restrictions as to who can open a Term Deposit account. Let's say you want to deposit $10000/- towards your sons college funds, you can visit your nearby bank branch and open a TD as a joint account between you and your son.A minor is a person who has not completed the age of 18 years. As such according to Section 11, of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, a minor is not competent to contracat. Therefore, any contract entered into by a n\minor except those fjor the necessaries of life supplied to him, is void ab initio, and are therefore unenforceable.However, a banker can open a savings bank accout in the name of a minor and he runs no risk, as long the account is in credit.Similarly, a banker can also open a Term Deposit account in the name of a minor provided he doesn't give loans to the minor. This is because a banker will have to face risks when he gives a loan to a minor because he cannot recover the loan amount from the minor, who is not competent to contract.In case a banker decides to grant a loan to a minor for the necessaries of life for him, it is necessary to satisfy himself that the minor has got sufficient property. This is because a minor's property can be made liable, but a minor cannot be personally made liable for the loan.In the eyes of law, a minor is a pampered child. Hence, a minor can become a major problem.M.J. SUBRAMANYAM, XCHANGING, BANGALORE
Good Samaritan laws in the United States are laws or acts protecting from liability those who choose to aid others who are injured or ill. They are intended to reduce bystanders' hesitation to assist, for fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death. Similarly, in Canada, a good Samaritan doctrine is a legal principle that prevents a rescuer who has voluntarily helped a victim in distress from being successfully sued for 'wrongdoing'. Its purpose is to keep people from being reluctant to help a stranger in need for fear of legal repercussions if they were to make some mistake in treatment.[1] Good Samaritan laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, as will their interactions with various other legal principles, such as consent, parental rights and the right to refuse treatment. Such laws generally do not apply to medical professionals' or career emergency responders' on-the-job conduct, but some extend protection to professional rescuers when they are acting in a volunteer capacity. The principles contained in good Samaritan laws more typically operate in countries in which the foundation of the legal system is English Common Law, such as Australia[2]. In many countries that use civil law as the foundation for their legal systems, the same legal effect is more typically achieved using a principle of duty to rescue.
If you only carry liability insurance, that is all that the insurance company is liable for in this state.
The driver who hit the pedestrian is liable, not their insurance company. The drivers insurance company will normally be responsible for payment of valid claims up to the policy limits for which the their insured driver is found liable.
The owner of the car is liable for the accident itself and the damage. However, the insurance company might have to pay for it, depending on the owners insurance cover.
If someone causes damages to your property, they are liable. This means, however that you have to deal with their insurance company directly, rather then your insurance company doing it for you.
No, an insurance company does not get notified of a parking tickets. Insurance companies are only liable for handling accidents.
Sounds like he would be. Good luck duking it out with him.
If the vehicle is not properly registered the insurance company is not liable. Unless at the time the "temporary tag" was valid. I used to work as an attorney for Liberty Mutual. In California, whether or not a car is currently registered is not relevant to the insurance coverage. The insurance company is still on the hook, even if the registration has expired at some point after the insurance company issued its policy.
If the accident is your fault, your insurance company is not going to pay out anything. If it is the other person's fault, the other insurance company will be liable.
Not usually. It sounds like the insurance company was a victim of fraud.
If the driver was uninsured or only had liability insurance, they would be liable to still pay the finance company back or face a lawsuit.
If a claim is submitted after the filing limit and the member is not liable, the claim may be denied by the insurance company due to the late submission. This means that the insurance company may not cover the expenses or damages associated with the claim.
If the title, registration, and insurance are still all in your name, you (or your insurance company) would be responsible.