the gov is expansive
According to structural functionalists, modernization results in increased efficiency, specialization of roles, and the development of complex systems to accommodate societal needs. This process is seen as leading to societal progress and advancement as traditional systems are replaced with more dynamic and adaptable structures.
Emile Durkheim and Herbert Spencer both viewed society as a living organism and are considered the earliest structural functionalists. They believed that society is composed of interrelated parts that work together to maintain social stability and harmony.
Structural functionalists view education as a crucial institution that serves to promote social stability and cohesion by transmitting knowledge and values to individuals. They would emphasize the role of education in preparing individuals for their future roles in society and maintaining the overall functioning of the social system.
Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer
Emile Durkheim and Herbert Spencer viewed society as a living organism and were among the earliest structural functionalists. They believed that each part of society plays a specific role in maintaining the overall stability and functioning of society, similar to how different organs work together in a living organism.
they view society as a peaceful unit
the structure
the structure
Functionalists refer to how parts of society fit together to form a whole as "organic analogy" or "organic solidarity." They believe that each part of society serves a function that contributes to the overall stability and functioning of society as a whole.
Functionalists view discrimination as a way for society to maintain social order by differentiating between groups and roles. They argue that discrimination can serve a purpose in reinforcing norms and values within a society, thus contributing to social stability. Additionally, functionalists may see discrimination as a mechanism for promoting competition and encouraging individuals to strive for success.
A functionalists would argue that everything in society has a function that in the end makes up society as a whole. They would argue that conflict has a function in society. A conflict theorists would argue that conflict is not a function of society but an actual natural trait of society.
Groups such as structural functionalists and conflict theorists would focus on macro-level analysis when examining patterns of society. They emphasize how larger social structures and systems influence individuals and society as a whole.