Census
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Sample
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
A random sample is better than a census because it takes less time and costs less.
It is more accurate, unbiased and includes every item in the population, whereas sampling may be biased, and sampling is not totally representative.
this is brief, but a census gathers data from the whole group/poulation, wheras a sample investigation on takes a small part of the group/poulation, a sample
Less time and less cost for a sample.
A sample survey is asked of a limited group of people, while a census is conducted in an attempted to get an answer from all people in a geographical area.
Surveys are quick and census is more accurate.
A Census is the type of survey for a complete population. A Sample Survey is only a portion of the population which is used to make predictions on the representation of the actual population.
a census is the procedure of systematically acquiring and recording information about all d members of a given population and a sample is a group from d population a census is more thorough and gives accurate information about a population while being more expensive and comsuming time comsuing rather than a sample
becuase it is more accurate.
A sample survey may be preferable than a census because it can be more comprehensive. While its research only involves a subset, it is typically more accurate.
A sample is a portion and a census measures absolutely everyone in the whole country. A representative sample measures a small number of people who fit a particular category of people: surveying 200 white male smokers between 20 and 40 who have had surgery for throat cancer (out of a total number of say 35,000 men who fit that profile).
De facto census data provides a real-time snapshot of a population's characteristics and distribution, allowing for timely decision-making and resource allocation. It can capture transient populations and visitors who may not be included in a traditional census. Additionally, de facto data collection methods are often more cost-effective and efficient compared to traditional census methods.