To determine which sentence has an underlined infinitive phrase functioning as a subject, please provide the sentences in question. Once I have that information, I can help identify the correct one.
Since "area" is not a verb, "to area" cannot be an infinitive phrase, or even just an infinitive. "To area" could be a prepositional phrase but it does not appear to have any meaning by itself. One might say "to the area" but never simply "to area."
Write into as one word. It is one preposition and should be treated as such. If perhaps in some strange sentence, the word to was part of an infinitive, then the in and the to would be separate. Maybe someone could figure out such a sentence but it would be difficult.
No. One or the other is correct. We use can plus the infinitive without to: I can do that. But we use ablewith the copula verb ( to be, for example) and the infinitive with to. I am able to do that.
One example of a sentence with a series of words or phrases is: "I need to buy apples, oranges, bananas, and grapes from the grocery store."
An infinitive is an unconjugated verb: no one is doing the action. For example, to walk is an infinitive; no one is doing the walking. I walk is conjugated to the first person; I am doing the walking.To is generally the sign of infinitive. To play, to sing, to watchI went to market to buy some books. He wishes to behappy.However, after certain verbs 'bare infinitive ' is used.I saw him walk down the hill. He heard me sing. (bare infinitive)
Transitional phrases are used in writing to 'transition' from one thought to the other. They are placed within paragraphs and at the beginning of a sentence. These include phrases like 'in addition' and 'for example.'
An http://www.answers.com/topic/infinitive is the "to" form of a http://www.answers.com/topic/verb, as in "to play." A split infinitive is a http://www.answers.com/topic/phrase in which to is separated from the verb. The sentence "I decided to quickly and directly go home" contains a split infinitive. Some people consider it poor style, or even incorrect style, to split an infinitive. I prefer to think of split infinitives as generally unnecessary. Given a little thought, one can usually construct a better sentence. The sentence "I decided to go quickly and directly home", is more easily understood.
Yes it can. for example: "John sat on the bench by the pond" where "on the bench" is one prepositional phrase (on being the preposition) and "by the pond" is the second (with by being the preposition).
Consequently
There are many activities that help foster fluency. One activity is to take the sentence and cut it apart into phrases. Then, read the phrases with the words blended together.
to the show