The two words in toto are Latin, and they mean entirely. I can't think of any circumstances in which you might want to use them in preference to a simple English word or three (as a whole, absolutely, entirely, completely, in total), but if you do want to do so, here is an example:
'I rejected her argument in toto although she made some good points to support it.'
Think of a situation where the word fringe may possibly be appropriate to use. In other words, learn the meaning of the word, and you'll know how you can make a sentence that includes it.
de joure sentence making is not possible, so jao
Starting a sentence with "for" is not necessarily improper, but it may make the sentence sound more formal or structured. It can be used to introduce a reason or explanation in the sentence. However, overusing it may affect the flow of the writing.
She may go to the store later if she finishes her chores.
One day we may be able to travel across the universe.
If you ask a question you may obtain an answer.
When industry moves away, a flourishing town may quickly become decadent.
The word derivative is a derivation of the root word derive. You may make a derivation of my original artwork under the creative commons license.
Yes, the word 'no' can be a complete sentence when it is a response to a sentence that came just before it. As a response, the previous sentence is implied as part of the sentence "No." Example: May I go with you? No. (No, you may not go with me.)
Though it may seem like a paradox, people who work more hours generally make less money.
I envisage my wedding day as being perfect but I do know that things may go wrong.
an at may weighs a centigram