The founding fathers create the congressional decision making process to be... slow and deliberative.
Bureaucrats exercise the rule that there is a special high office for every decision making and that crucial decisions are made through a series of senior offices for them to hold. It makes work place decision making unnecessarily slow.
Slow mentation refers to a decreased speed or sluggishness in cognitive processing and thought. It can manifest as delays in decision-making, difficulty concentrating, and sluggish mental responses. Factors such as fatigue, distraction, or medical conditions can contribute to slow mentation.
A slow process is a rapid process in which chances over a long period of time
Salt can slow down the fermentation process by regulating the activity of yeast. It helps control the growth of yeast, leading to a more controlled and balanced fermentation process in bread making.
Perceiving things in slow motion can happen when your brain is under stress or in a high-pressure situation. This can cause your brain to process information differently, making time seem to slow down.
Coalition governments can fail faster due to the differing ideologies and priorities of the parties involved, leading to disagreements and instability. Additionally, the need for consensus and compromise in decision-making can slow down the government's ability to implement policies efficiently. Changes in leadership or shifts in public opinion can also contribute to the breakdown of coalition governments.
it means it goes slow
A bureaucratic hurdle refers to an obstacle or complication created by bureaucratic processes or regulations that can impede progress or decision-making. These hurdles often involve excessive paperwork, complex procedures, or rigid compliance requirements that can slow down processes in organizations or government. They can lead to frustration and inefficiency, making it challenging for individuals or businesses to achieve their goals.
The answer depends on how is participative management defined, I assume you mean the style where decision-making is more inclusive and leaders/managers incorporate employees' thoughts, ideas and contributions into overall decision. Here are some disadvantages to keep in mind: 1. Decision-making process can be very slow. This of course depends on what form of participative management is being practiced; if everything requires consensus or majority, speed of decision can be huge problem, and sometimes decisions will not be made at all. 2. It is easy for leaders to abdicate their responsibility in this model because participative management can easily degenerate into decision-by-committe. 3. Decisions can be sub-optimal in many cases if the focus is on remaining participative (and inclusive) and not on making right decision. Here is a good link on this: Participative
Slow
slow