No, it should be, 'Someone brought you an article about the CEO.' (or '...an article from theCEO.'). That is, assuming that CEO is the chief executive officer, a person.
In Standard English, it is not. The correct past tense of "bring" is "brought". "Brung" may be used in some dialects, however, though
Yes. The word "brung" is actually a real word. It can be "brought" or it can be "brung" as the past tense of "bring."
"Brung" is not a word in the English language. It is slang for "brought".
"Brang" is not a correct word in English. The correct past tense of "bring" is "brought." "Brung" is a non-standard dialectal variation that is not universally accepted as correct in formal writing.
Brung is an improper past tense of the irregular verb bring. The correct past tense form is brought.
Yes, "brang" and "brung" are common errors made by children when conjugating the verb "bring" in past tense. The correct past tense form of "bring" is "brought."
Brought is the simple past and past participle of bring.
No. Brought. Yes, brung is a word! It means the past tense of bring!
"Brung" is often used colloquially as the past tense of "bring," but it is not considered standard English. The correct past tense form is "brought." While "brung" may appear in informal speech or regional dialects, it lacks acceptance in formal writing and standard grammar. The evolution of language means that some non-standard forms can be widely understood, but they do not gain official recognition.
No. We say bring, brought and brought. I am the cleverest person ever so I know every thing .... Well, Yes BRING, BRANG and BRUNG are all propper words. It is simple; its just like SING, SANG and SUNG or RING, RANG and RUNG. So if anyone tells you different dont believe them!
No, "brought" is the past participle of "bring." "Brung" is considered nonstandard English and is not commonly used.
Yes he has he cried on smackdown when someone brutaly beat down the undertaker then they brung his casket out then Kane started crying 5 minutes later