Alleged violations of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) can lead to serious legal and diplomatic consequences, including international investigations and prosecutions by entities such as the International Criminal Court. States and individuals found responsible may face sanctions, loss of legitimacy, or damage to their reputation. Additionally, such violations can exacerbate conflicts, lead to increased civilian casualties, and hinder post-conflict reconciliation efforts. Ultimately, accountability mechanisms serve to uphold humanitarian standards and deter future violations.
A. true
True
True
So that alleged violations of the law can be presented and judged according to the applicable laws.
So that alleged violations of the law can be presented and judged according to the applicable laws.
There are no advantages or disadvantages. Civil court is where alleged violations of civil law are heard, and criminal court is where alleged violations of criminal law are heard. Each court is segregated into hearing their particular assigned areas of the law.
must continue to adhere to LOAC
must continue to adhere to LOAC
You will get a write up
Jessie Jackson Jr.
Extreme military necessity excuses acts that are normally considered war crimes under LOAC
The United States Department of Justice as well as the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over violations of antitrust laws. Alleged violations are investigated by federal agents and if found to violate any antitrust laws, legal action is initiated.