A "not adversely affected" ruling typically means that a particular group or segment of workers is not facing negative consequences, such as job losses or reduced employment opportunities, due to a specific policy or economic condition. In the context of unemployment, it suggests that these workers are likely to remain employed or may even benefit from favorable labor market conditions. Overall, such a ruling can indicate stability or growth in employment for the affected group, contributing positively to the overall unemployment rate.
it means "against" or " opposite". It can also mean "negatively", as in "having a bad cold adversely affected his ability to talk".
If something is adversely affected, it means it has been affected in a negative way.
it means "against" or " opposite". It can also mean "negatively", as in "having a bad cold adversely affected his ability to talk".
if you mean unemployment benefit, yes it does
The ruling class is the one with the power.
official order or court ruling
to lose your job.
I suppose you mean unemployment compensation. That is administered by the state you live in. The answer is never.
struck repeatedly, typically with the fists or criticized adversely
There is no cyclical unemployment.
If you react adversely to a substance, you show that you don't like the substance and that the substance is unpleasant or even harms you.
Full employment doesn't mean that there is zero unemployment. Full employment only means that the economy is operating at full employment because there is only structural unemployment, frictional unemployment, and seasonal unemployment. Remaining unemployment is cyclical. Even when an economy is working properly, it will experience frictional, seasonal, and structural unemployment. (gp)