Well the one definition of asymmetric is: anything that fails to be symmetric.
So a possible sentence if your working with math could be:
The equation is clearly asymmetric.
No it is not.
An antisymmetry is the mathematical condition of being antisymmetric.
Symmetric wave functions remain unchanged when particles are exchanged, while antisymmetric wave functions change sign when particles are exchanged.
An antisymmetrization is an act of making something antisymmetric.
A bivector is a mathematical term for an antisymmetric tensor of second rank.
Yes, identical fermions have antisymmetric wavefunctions. Identical bosons have symmetric -- look up Spin Statistics in any Standard Field Theory text.
Yes they can be, the two definitions are not related.
An antisymmetric relation on a set is a binary relation ( R ) such that if ( aRb ) and ( bRa ) then ( a = b ). For a set with ( n ) elements, there are ( n(n-1)/2 ) pairs where ( a \neq b ), and each of these pairs can independently be included or excluded from the relation. Additionally, each element can relate to itself, contributing ( 2^n ) possibilities for self-relations. Therefore, the total number of antisymmetric relations is ( 2^{n(n-1)/2} ).
A symmetric signal is one that is identical when reversed in time; mathematically, this means ( x(t) = x(-t) ). In contrast, an antisymmetric signal satisfies the condition ( x(t) = -x(-t) ), meaning that the signal is the negative of itself when reversed in time. Symmetric signals exhibit even symmetry, while antisymmetric signals exhibit odd symmetry. These properties are important in various fields, including signal processing and control systems, as they influence how signals behave under transformations.
Antisymmetric refers to a property of a binary relation on a set where, for any two elements ( a ) and ( b ), if both ( a ) is related to ( b ) and ( b ) is related to ( a ), then ( a ) must be equal to ( b ). In mathematical terms, if ( a \sim b ) and ( b \sim a ), then ( a = b ). This concept is commonly used in order theory and linear algebra, particularly in the context of matrices and vector spaces.
It is a partially ordered set. That means it is a set with the following properties: a binary relation that is 1. reflexive 2. antisymmetric 3. transitive a totally ordered set has totality which means for every a and b in the set, a< or equal to b or b< or equal to a. Not the case in a poset. So a partial order does NOT have totality.
"Posetion" appears to be a typographical error or a misinterpretation of the term "position" or "poset." In mathematics, a "poset" is short for "partially ordered set," which is a set equipped with a binary relation that is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. If you meant something else by "posetion," please provide more context for a more accurate definition.