A nonrestrictive clause is a clause that is not essential to the overall meaning of a sentence and cannot be punctuated as its own sentence; they are also known as nonessential clauses and dependant clauses. In the sentence "After he returned home from school, James realized that he had left a notebook on his bus," the introductory adverbial clause "After he returned home from school" modifies and is not essential to the meaning of the main clause "James realized that he had left a notebook on his bus" because it tells when the realization occurred; therefore, the clause is nonrestrictive.
Which part of the sentence is a nonrestrictive clause?
A nonrestrictive clause is a clause that is not essential to the overall meaning of a sentence and cannot be punctuated as its own sentence; they are also known as nonessential clauses and dependant clauses. In the sentence "After he returned home from school, James realized that he had left a notebook on his bus," the introductory adverbial clause "After he returned home from school" modifies and is not essential to the meaning of the main clause "James realized that he had left a notebook on his bus" because it tells when the realization occurred; therefore, the clause is nonrestrictive.
Nonrestrictive element.
The correct punctuation for "which" would depend on its usage in a sentence. It could be followed by a comma if introducing a nonrestrictive clause or used without punctuation for a restrictive clause.
Yes,this would be nonrestrictiuve because most pple believe commas come after a long period of sentancess///
No it's not.
no . Additional: 'Which' sometimes has a comma before it, but it depends on the sentence. I find it hard to imagine a situation when 'which' would have a comma after it.
A comma is typically used after "which" when it introduces a nonrestrictive clause, adding extra information that can be omitted without changing the meaning of the sentence. This type of clause is set off by commas to show that it is not essential to the main clause's meaning.
Yes, a comma is needed, because "which" is used in what is called a nonrestrictive clause, and nonrestrictive clauses require commas around them. Restrictive clauses use "that" instead of "which" and do not require commas. I've provided examples below. Nonrestrictive clause: I tossed the shirt, which had a coffee stain on it, into the hamper. In this sentence, "which had a coffee stain on it" adds information about the shirt, but it is not used to identify a particular shirt. Restrictive clause: I tossed the shirt that had a coffee stain on it into the hamper. In this sentence, "that had a coffee stain on it" is used to say that it was specifically that shirt that I tossed into the hamper. It indicates that one of the shirts had a coffee stain, and that was the shirt I tossed into the hamper. While this answers more than the specific question asked, it is important to know that "which" is used in nonrestrictive clauses, and that is why the comma is needed.
"if" clause and a "then" clause. The "if" clause states a condition that must be true in order for the statement to be true, and the "then" clause states the result or outcome if the condition is met.
The use of a comma does not depend on the word, it depends on the sentence structure. At times a comma will follow 'which' and at other times it will not.
Not necessarily. There is no word or phrase in English that requires a comma. Use a comma when which introduces a clause. We may get that which we desire. We got him fired, which was our desire.