Constitutional review is the process by which courts or specific judicial bodies assess the conformity of laws, regulations, or governmental actions with a constitution. This process ensures that legislation aligns with constitutional principles and protects fundamental rights. It serves as a check on legislative and executive powers, promoting the rule of law and safeguarding democracy. In many countries, this review can lead to the annulment of laws that are found unconstitutional.
Review of is correct.
Constitutional review can be conducted through various methods, primarily including judicial review, legislative review, and constitutional review by specialized bodies. Judicial review involves courts assessing the constitutionality of laws and government actions, often through cases brought before them. Legislative review allows the legislative body to evaluate its own laws for compliance with the constitution. Specialized bodies, such as constitutional courts or commissions, may also be established to oversee constitutional compliance independently.
How do you think the Right to Constitutional Remedies connects to the idea of ... the process of judicial review, in which the federal courts review statutes.
India.
the meaning is that they could do anything constitutional
,hh
"Constitution review" most likely refers to the courts' power of judicial review. For more information about judicial review, see Related Questions, below.
Peter Bayne has written: 'Martin Luther' 'Constitutional review jurisdiction in Papua New Guinea' -- subject(s): Judicial review, Jurisdiction, Constitutional law
Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary
The principle of judicial review.
Yes. Because they have the power to decide laws of the congress.
Judicial review is important because laws passed need to be checked to make sure they are constitutional. This review is performed by members of the Supreme Court