what is the objective of statutory interpretation
Peter Benson Maxwell has written: 'On the interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes 'The interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes
object of interpretation of statutes are as follows: 1. codifying statute 2.consolditating statute 3.declaratory statute
Z. A. Channa has written: 'The interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law
Statutes passed by U.S. Congress are typically general in nature. The words used in the statute need to be applied to particular circumstance, cases. Attorneys argue about proper interpretation of statutes. When an appeals court decides which interpretation is correct, that ruling stands as a valid interpretation until a higher court decides otherwise. The interpretation of a statute becomes the law of the land.
No. One of the functions of courts is to apply the statutes to the facts of a particular case.
No, statutes are not decided by the courts; they are laws enacted by legislative bodies, such as Congress or state legislatures. However, courts interpret and apply these statutes when resolving legal disputes. Through this interpretation, courts can influence how statutes are understood and enforced, which may lead to significant legal precedents. Ultimately, while courts do not create statutes, their rulings can shape the application of those laws.
K. Shanmukham has written: 'A. Ramaiya's the Sale of Goods Act' -- subject(s): India, Sales 'N.S. Bindra's interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Law, Interpretation and construction, States
Statutes are laws enacted by legislative bodies, such as federal or state parliaments and assemblies. They provide a framework for legal regulation and governance within their respective jurisdictions. Statutes can address a wide range of issues, from criminal law to public health, and they are typically subject to interpretation by the judiciary. Once passed, statutes can be amended or repealed by subsequent legislative action.
Nils Beckman has written: 'Precedents and the construction of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Stare decisis
Noli C. Diaz has written: 'Statutory construction' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes
Randy N. Graham has written: 'Statutory interpretation' -- subject(s): Law, Interpretation and construction, Statutes, Cases 'Legal ethics' -- subject(s): Legal ethics, Textbooks, Cases
Open objectives are goals that describe an outcome but do not specify how to achieve it. Closed objectives are specific, measurable goals with defined steps for achieving them. Open objectives allow for creativity and flexibility in achieving the outcome, while closed objectives provide clear direction and milestones.