The Virginia Plan was primarily supported by the larger states, including Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts. These states favored the plan's proposal for a bicameral legislature with representation based on population, which would benefit them compared to smaller states. In contrast, smaller states like New Jersey opposed the plan, advocating for equal representation regardless of population size.
The New Jersey Plan, which advocated for equal representation for each state in Congress regardless of population size, would likely garner support from smaller states. States such as Delaware, Vermont, and Wyoming, which have smaller populations and thus would benefit from equal representation, would be inclined to support this plan. Additionally, other states with concerns about being overshadowed by larger states, like Rhode Island and South Dakota, might also favor the New Jersey Plan.
He proposed the New Jersey (Paterson) Plan. It counteracted the Virginia plan by saying that all states should have an equal vote in congress. If the number of representatives was based off of population like the Virginia plan suggested, small states would be swallowed up by larger states. The small states would lose their voice in the government.
This was a result of the Connecticut Compromise, whereby representation in the House would be determined by population (favoring the largest states, such as Virginia) whereas representation in the Senate would be fixed at two per state (giving smaller states like Connecticut equal power).See the related link below for more details.
The Great Compromise was agreed to and put into the Constitution because the Constitution would not have even gotten out of the Convention unless the large and small states were satisfied that their interests would not be dominated by the others. Representation in Congress was originally to be based on population. The larger states would have more votes than smaller states. A plan was offered where each state would be represented by an equal number of representatives. The larger states would not accept this because they felt that smaller states with an equal vote could dominate larger states. The Great Compromise creating two houses of Congress, one based on population, the other with equal votes was agreed upon as a reasonable way to protect the interests of both sides. Compromises like this were common. It is the same as when the southern states insisted that the issue of slavery be taken out of the Declaration of Independence. If it had not been taken out, the southern states would never had agreed to it and it never would have been issued.
Small states did not like the idea of 2 houses with representation Based on the population or the wealth, on the other hand larger states did.Small states would have less representativesSmall states had less population than larger states.
Small states did not like the idea of 2 houses with representation Based on the population or the wealth, on the other hand larger states did.Small states would have less representativesSmall states had less population than larger states.
The same as every other person.
As much as you would like president Calderon from Mexico dictate the population policy of the United States. A definitive no is the answer.
Small states did not like the idea of 2 houses with representation Based on the population or the wealth, on the other hand larger states did.Small states would have less representativesSmall states had less population than larger states.
To give each state equality of representation. The House of Representatives is set up to give the states equal representation by population. However, this strict adherence alone would give more populous states more representative power than less populous states. By adding the Senate with two senators from each state the states are equally represented.
The New Jersey Plan would likely appeal to smaller states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This plan proposed a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state, regardless of population size, which would protect the interests of smaller states from being overshadowed by larger ones. It aimed to maintain the framework of the Articles of Confederation, emphasizing state sovereignty and equality among states.