Rates of urbanization are higher in Less Economically Developed Countries (LEDCs) than in More Economically Developed Countries (MEDCs) primarily due to rapid population growth and migration from rural areas in search of better economic opportunities and living conditions. LEDCs often experience industrialization, which attracts people to cities for jobs, while MEDCs have more established urban centers with slower growth rates. Additionally, factors such as rural poverty, lack of infrastructure, and limited access to services in rural areas push populations toward urban centers in LEDCs.
The pace of urbanization differs between More Economically Developed Countries (MEDCs) and Less Economically Developed Countries (LEDCs) primarily due to economic factors, infrastructure development, and historical context. MEDCs typically have established urban centers with advanced infrastructure and services, leading to slower rates of urbanization as populations stabilize. In contrast, LEDCs often experience rapid urbanization as people migrate to cities in search of better economic opportunities, driven by factors such as rural poverty and lack of employment. Additionally, LEDCs may lack the necessary infrastructure to accommodate this rapid influx, leading to informal settlements and urban challenges.
LEDCs (Less Economically Developed Countries) are countries with lower income levels, higher poverty rates, and less developed infrastructure. MEDCs (More Economically Developed Countries) are countries with higher income levels, more advanced infrastructure, and a higher standard of living. EDCs (Emerging Economies or Economies in Transition) are countries that are in the process of transitioning from being less developed to more developed, often experiencing rapid economic growth.
Birth rate refers to how many children are born per 1000 people, so higher birth rates result from anything influencing this 'choice'. reasons why LEDCs have a higher birth rate are both due to a falling birth rate in many MEDCs as well as increasing birth rates in LEDCs. One: sex and age - If women are within child-bearing age (18-25 I suppose is accurate) they are more likely to have children and less likely to lose the child. This can explain differences between LEDCs and MEDCs as in LEDCs there is a greater proportion of younger women than in MEDCs in their population, which will in turn increase births per 1000 people. Two: Economic reasons. In MEDCs less people are having children, as they give an 'opportunity cost' (i.e. if a family have a child they may not be able to move into a larger house, for example, due to needing the money for raising the child). In LEDCs children can instead be seen as an economic asset, particularly in rural agrarian cultures where more children means an extra pair of hands to work the land. Both are significant; the first in deterring births in MEDCs and the second incentivising them in LEDCs. Three: Social reasons. Firstly, there is evidence to support that with gender equality fertility rates fall, thus birth rates also fall. It is the same with education of women. Both give women a choice on whether or not to have children, making it less of a part of life, which will inevitably lead to some deciding against having children. This is less the case in LEDCs, explaining why more women have children here than in MEDCs. Secondly, it can also be seen favourably for men to have a lot of children, pushing both men and women to have more children to achieve a higher social status (the case in many parts of Africa). Thirdly, if expectations are that half of your children will die before adulthood, you are likely to have more to ensure the family can continue - with higher infant mortality in LEDCs a lot of women choose to have more children to ensure that at least one survives (which is not the case in MEDCs). Finally, contraception plays a vital role both in availibility and willingness - certain cultures will frown upon contraception for religious reasons (many of these in LEDCs), and LEDCs are less likely to invest in family planning, so people are less aware of measures they can take to have less children.
One of the advantages of globalization is that there can be work outsourcing to developing countries. Labor and parts can be acquired at cheaper rates. However, one disadvantage is that it can lead LEDCs to risk its own natural resources like oil and rainforests just to supply for MEDCs.
LEDCs are non-industrial nationsMedc's are industrialized nationsMEDC- MORE ECONOMICALLY DEVELOPED COUNTRIESLEDC- LESS ECONOMICALLY DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Yes, mostly higher crime rates and environmental degradation.
Brazil has a huge population because the enourmous country Brazil is, but there only live about 23 people per square km. You´ll maybe think that´s very little amount for cities like Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro etc... but for example in the Amazonas very little people live there. Less than 2 per square km this does that only life 23 people estimately per square km. The main reasons are because the weather and that people want to visit places like Brasilia, then they like it stay there and form a huge family which increases the population
Birth rates can be decreased in LEDCs as many of the babies die as there's no hospitals or if there are hospitals they haven't got the right equipment for them to survive. Also there may be a illness going around and when the babies get they aren't strong enough to get rid of it. They may also die of starvation or dehydration. Hope this helps :)
The trade fair benefits the LEDCs because they provide us with raw materials at very cheap rates.
There are many different reasons and each case is different but the main reasons that LEDCs are affected worse are:They have less money to spend on buillding defences and evacuation plansthe buildings are likely to be poorly constructed and will fall easilythe low literacy rates, secondary education and connection to internet and television networks means that less people are likely to know when the tsunami is going to be hit and how to deal with itLess planning regulation (slums) are likely to be built in places that will flood first meaning that death tolls will be largeThe main reason really though is that LEDCs are less prepared for the disaster then MEDCs
Asian LEDCs (Less Economically Developed Countries) are nations in Asia characterized by low income levels, limited industrialization, and a lower standard of living compared to more developed countries. Examples of Asian LEDCs include Afghanistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh, where economic challenges are often compounded by factors such as political instability, inadequate infrastructure, and limited access to education and healthcare. These countries typically rely heavily on agriculture and have higher rates of poverty and unemployment. Efforts to improve their economic conditions often focus on sustainable development and international aid.
Crime rates are often higher in the West and South due to a combination of socioeconomic factors, including higher poverty rates, unemployment, and income inequality in some areas. Urbanization in these regions can also lead to increased crime, as larger populations may result in more opportunities for criminal activity. Additionally, cultural and historical factors, such as varying law enforcement practices and community resources, contribute to these regional disparities.