Oh, dude, authority is like totally great because, you know, it helps keep things in order and prevents chaos from breaking loose. Plus, it gives us rules to follow so we don't end up living in a real-life version of "The Purge." So yeah, authority is kinda necessary for society to function smoothly, but like, don't let it go to your head, man.
You can take it on good authority that this is a perfectly acceptable answer to your question.
An employer has lots of authority over the employees.
Yes, a good is considered excludable if it can be restricted or limited in access by a seller or authority.
The housing authority helps you receive your own home with a low mortgage. The housing authority is ran by the government and has been assisting people for many years.
Answer Good and Bad
A person holding a line authority is higher than a person holding a staff authority. this is because a line authority flows from the head of the organization to the subordinate staffs. a good example of a line authority is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) On the other hand, a staff authority will comprise only the head of a certain department within the whole organization and his/her staff. A good example of a staff authority is a company supervisor whose authority is primarily felt by his/her juniors and not the whole organization
because it is good for us to balance
Sports Authority has a better selection, but the prices are nearly equal.
Mark Antony would definitely NOT be a good president. He has been characterized as a good subordinate, but one who can't handle authority. He was a guy who enjoyed the perks of authority, but didn't or couldn't do the work.
To enforce rules for the greater good and prevent anarchy.
I did not arrogate my authority when I made the decision to fire.
On good authority the best answer to your question is - ball&socket