authority is good because we are controlled, we will be safe and usally good. but with bad authority people will take controll and do what they want. is that a good thing? people would fight and there would be nobody to stop it.
You can take it on good authority that this is a perfectly acceptable answer to your question.
An employer has lots of authority over the employees.
Yes, a good is considered excludable if it can be restricted or limited in access by a seller or authority.
The housing authority helps you receive your own home with a low mortgage. The housing authority is ran by the government and has been assisting people for many years.
Answer Good and Bad
A person holding a line authority is higher than a person holding a staff authority. this is because a line authority flows from the head of the organization to the subordinate staffs. a good example of a line authority is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) On the other hand, a staff authority will comprise only the head of a certain department within the whole organization and his/her staff. A good example of a staff authority is a company supervisor whose authority is primarily felt by his/her juniors and not the whole organization
because it is good for us to balance
Sports Authority has a better selection, but the prices are nearly equal.
Mark Antony would definitely NOT be a good president. He has been characterized as a good subordinate, but one who can't handle authority. He was a guy who enjoyed the perks of authority, but didn't or couldn't do the work.
On good authority the best answer to your question is - ball&socket
I did not arrogate my authority when I made the decision to fire.
To enforce rules for the greater good and prevent anarchy.