A claim for emotional distress needs to be related to an action that would cause much more distress than mere incompetence. Plus, the government has sovereign immunity. Tort claims against the government require much more paperwork than a lawsuit against a private party. The answer in short, almost definitely no, you cannot. You can write your elected representatives however.
No, unless you can sufficiently demonstrate that it caused "severe emotional distress."
Main intentional torts against people include assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and trespass to land or chattels. Against property, the main intentional torts are trespass to land and chattels, conversion, and nuisance.
Short answer, NO! Unless you can prove malice aforethought, or a conspiracy, simple incompetence is not grounds for a lawsuit against an ex-employee. If it were so, the US auto industry would not need the government to get help, they could just sue the employees making the cars of the 70s and 80s.
It would depend on what type of emotional stress you have been under at the university and if you feel you have a good case against them then you should find a lawyer to represent you because suing for emotional stress can be a hard case to win in a court of law.
Individuals who are forced to wear briefs against their will may experience psychological effects such as feelings of humiliation, loss of autonomy, and decreased self-esteem. This can lead to emotional distress and potentially impact their mental well-being.
Yes you can. My husband left me to go to Mexico and married a 12 year old child there. Call the Mexican Consule. The laws against bigamy and emotional distress are the same in Mexico as the United States.
Kidnapping is primarily considered a criminal case, as it involves the illegal confinement of a person against their will, typically leading to severe legal penalties. Criminal cases are prosecuted by the government and focus on punishing the offender for violating laws. However, victims of kidnapping may also pursue civil cases to seek compensation for damages, such as emotional distress or medical expenses.
Torts such as assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress protect against intentional interference with persons. These torts aim to provide legal remedies for individuals who have been harmed by deliberate acts that interfere with their personal well-being or freedom.
It depends on the kind of offense? If it is considered a "public offense" which you can query into that for a description, it is a criminal matter. If it is a emotional issue, or a reputation injury like Slander or Libel or Intentional infliction of emotional distress, it is a Tort Crime which is a Civil matter. Also worthy to mention the criminal matter can also have Civil implications as well.
Emotional duress refers to psychological distress or pressure, such as threats, manipulation, or intimidation, that is used to coerce someone. Physical duress, on the other hand, involves the use of force or violence to compel someone to do something against their will. Both types of duress can have serious impacts on an individual's well-being and ability to make free choices.
They do have a say against the government
I note you say "their" child and not "your" child. If the child is not yours how can it be used as an emotional weapon against you , it is not related to you.