0
In some states this can be the case. Society suffered for 'insane' criminals being hospitalized for a few years and out repeating their crimes over and over. In some states there are new laws that state 'a person can be insane but still responsible and understood what they did was wrong'.
There are new laws also that says if a person needs to be hospitalized they get the care they need. But once they are deemed better, they must serve out the rest of their sentence in prison.
These new laws have been a big help in the problem of criminal responsiblity and punishment. More of these laws are needed to relieve corrections officers at jails and prisons, who are usually not trained in caring for mentally ill patients. Their jobs are difficult enough.
What else can I help you with?
If a plea is given of insane do they still pull time for crime?
If the jury doesn't find the evidence given in support of the insanity defense to be believable, yes, the defendant can be found guilty as charged.
What percentage of homicides are victim precipitated?
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.
What is the definition for acquitted?
To relieve from a charge of fault or crime; declare not guilty: They acquitted him of the crime. The jury acquitted her, but I still think she's guilty.
According to one scholar as much as what percentage of crimes are precipitated by the victims?
Victims precipitate 0% of all crimes. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.
According to the scholar victims precipate as many percentof all homicides?
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.
What is the percent of victims that precipitate all homicides?
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is ALWAYS made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.What is the percent of victims that precipitate all homicides?
Do victims precipitate in homicides?
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator. If it is determined to be a homicide, the killer is solely responsible for the homicide. The convictions for those that use excuses that blame the victim confirm this.
According to one scholarvictims precipitate as many as percent of all homicides. A.25 B.40 C.60 D.75?
Victims precipitate 0% of all crimes. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator. I can't imagine what that scholar's specialty is, certainly not crime.
What is the law changing the penalty for a crime applied after a person has been convicted of the crime?
The law is referred to as Ex Post Facto. Providing the sentence for the original offense wasn't applied to him, however, the person convicted under the old law is still constitutionally guilty.
According to one scholar victims precipitate as many as what percent of all homicides?
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.
Is it possible that a person be put in jail for a case of oral defamation even if the person is not proven guilty or the case is still on the court?
Oral defamation is a tort, not a crime. However, if a person is charged with a crime (for example, harassment may fit here), that person will be arrested. If they are not allowed bail or cannot make bail, they will wait in the county jail until their case is called to trial.
What happens when a person pleads guilty to a charge?
The court does not assume that you are necessarily guilty just because you plead guilty; there are many cases of innocent people who plead guilty, usually because of some mental illness. A delusional person may believe that he or she is guilty of something that he or she did not actually do. So, the case is still investigated, the evidence is still examined, and the person who pleaded guilty might still be acquitted. However, a guilty plea does constitute some degree of evidence, and it may lead to a guilty verdict, even for a person who is actually innocent. It depends upon what other evidence is available, and upon the care with which the court is handling the trial. It is unfortunately the case that sometimes the police and the prosecutor are just happy to convict someone, whether that person is guilty or not. It counts as a successful prosecution, that someone is found guilty.
