No, There is no reason for the removal of the foreskin. The foreskin plays an important part in the maintenance health and performance of the penis. Today less then 20% of men worldwide a are circumcised (MGM't) and most of these are done for religious cultural and right of passage into manhood rituals. some are done for what are claimed to be health reason's but these are false. circumcision is mutilation.
No when they circumcise they remove the foreskin only. Not the penis.
Having more foreskin removed.
A circumcised penis has the foreskin removed. An uncircumcised one does not.
The foreskin is a fold of skin that covers the head (glans) of the penis.
yes, you can get it removed. yes, it is safe (to an extent). yes, its expensive
the removal of a males foreskin on his penis
If you are refering to the foreskin, this is clearly genital mutilation and should be avoided.
Uncircumcised means that the penis still retains the foreskin.
The skin on the shaft of the penis extends over the head. All males are born with foreskin and for religious reasons or parents choice some are circumcised, the foreskin is removed.
The son of your First Cousin Once Removed, is your First Cousin Twice Removed.
No there is no need for a male to be circumcised. the fact is that it is a harmful procedure that seriously damages the function of the penis. The reasoning that is used in some cases that the foreskin needs to be removed when it is tight over the glans is also nonsense as the foreskin is made of tissue that can be stretched and made to move back and forth over the glans easily.
Ex:4:25: Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me.