Here's a really great article about explaining the peer review process: http://www.ehow.com/how_4765842_explain-peer-review-process.html
A literature review in a scholarly article includes a summary of existing research on the topic, analysis of different perspectives, identification of gaps in knowledge, and a synthesis of key findings to support the study's purpose.
The best peer-reviewed article database for finding scholarly research in psychology is PsycINFO, which is maintained by the American Psychological Association (APA).
An article review is a critical evaluation of a scholarly article written by an expert in the field. It typically involves summarizing the main points of the article, analyzing its strengths and weaknesses, and providing a thoughtful critique. This is done by reading the article carefully, taking notes, and then writing a structured review that includes an introduction, summary, analysis, and conclusion.
To effectively publish a scholarly article, one should conduct thorough research, write a well-structured paper following the guidelines of the target journal, carefully edit and revise the article, and submit it to reputable journals in the field for peer review.
A journal article review is an evaluation of a scholarly article written by experts in a particular field. It is typically conducted by reading the article carefully, analyzing its content, methodology, and conclusions, and then writing a critique that assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the study. The review may also include suggestions for improvement or further research.
It typically takes several months to a year for a scholarly journal article to be published after submission. The time frame can vary depending on factors such as the journal's review process, the number of revisions required, and the workload of the editors.
To get published in a journal, you typically need to conduct original research, write a scholarly article based on your findings, and submit it to a journal for review. The article will undergo a peer review process where experts in the field evaluate its quality and relevance. If the article is accepted, it will be published in the journal.
Key characteristics of a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article include rigorous research methods, citations to other scholarly works, an abstract summarizing the article, a clear structure with sections like introduction, methodology, results, and discussion, and a list of references at the end. These articles are typically written by experts in the field and undergo a thorough review process by other experts before publication.
The Harvard Business Review (HBR) is primarily a practitioner-oriented publication that focuses on business management and leadership topics. While it includes articles by academics and experts, HBR is not considered a scholarly source in the traditional sense, as it does not undergo the rigorous peer-review process typical of academic journals. Instead, it aims to provide insights and practical advice for business professionals. Therefore, while it can be informative and valuable, it should not be relied upon as a scholarly source for academic research.
No, a review article is not considered a primary source.
An ezine article is a piece of content or article that is published in an electronic magazine or online newsletter. It typically covers a specific topic or area of interest and is distributed digitally to subscribers. Ezine articles are often used for content marketing purposes to reach a targeted audience online.
A scholarly book review typically includes a summary of the book's content, an analysis of its strengths and weaknesses, an evaluation of the author's arguments and evidence, and a discussion of its relevance to the field of study.