I am putting five arguments,
1. My brother is unemployed.
2. He is graduate but not competent to take clerical task.
3. I am a owner of the firm engaged in placing people.
4. The firm has vacancy for graduate clerks.
5. When my brother applied for the clerical position,
I have used deductive reasoning to take judgment, whether to employ him in my firm or not.
Ans: 1. To ensure benefit of the firm I have rejected his candidature.
2. To maintain my relation and his wellbeing, I have accepted his candidature.
Both are equally important. Inductive reasoning is when one makes a conclusion based on patterns; deductive reasoning is based on a hypothesis already believed to be true. However, deductive reasoning does give a more "solid" conclusion because as long as the hypothesis is true, the conclusion will most likely to be true. An example is saying that all dogs are big; Harry is a dog, so it must be big. Since the hypothesis all dogs are big is false, Harry may not necessarily be big. If I change my hypothesis to be all dogs are mammals, thus concluding that Harry is a mammal since it is a dog, I would be correct, for I changed my hypothesis to a true fact. Using inductive reasoning, on the other hand, may result in a false conclusion. For example, since I am a human and I have brown hair, one could use inductive reasoning to say all humans have brown hair, which would be false. So, to sum it up, both inductive and deductive reasoning are important, but deductive reasoning is usually more reliable since as long as the hypothesis one's conclusion is based on is true, the conclusion itself will usually be true.
Sure, you count the apples in a basket, for example. Inductively, you found that there are five. Now, if you were to give an answer as to one of them being a part of a set of all the apples in a basket, you would have to say that it is a part of a set consisting of five apples.
Inductive reasoning is when someone provides strong evidence to the truth of something. An example would be showing someone a car that you are trying to sell and physically showing them that the car starts and the tires are in good condition.
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that involves making generalizations based on specific observations. It involves moving from specific instances to broader generalizations. For example, observing that all observed metals expand when heated would lead to the generalization that all metals expand when heated, based on inductive reasoning.
If the hands of the watch were altered then the time must be important.
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning sometimes used in scientific inquiry, to the background of fixed stars; it is quite a different matter to know why.
maganda ako
U rivbxavjdky
The ability to use deductive thinking is a time saving skill for a Pet Detective.
A deductive argument is and argument that the premises are claimed to give sufficient support for the conclusion to follow. The premises are repeated in the conclusion. Often the conclusion does not have any new information. eg The moon is circular when it is full the moon is circular therefore the moon is full.
could you give an example of a ridiculous part of the interface. Thanks.
you should always give reasoning when you need something...........