Viruses are inert until they encounter proteins on the surface of a cell that they are able to bind to. Once bound, they react by injecting their nucleic acid component into the cell, which takes it over making millions of copies of the virus.
No, it doesn't. This is one of the reasons scientists classify viruses as not living.
Not. It is not alive and can not respond.
nopi nope
any
No viruses do not have homeostasis. They have no cellular activities because they are not made of cells. Viruses do not respond or adapt to the environment. Any changes in the viruses are brought about by the host cells that make the new copies of the virus. When science says that viruses evolve, it is really the host cell that makes the changes in the virus. So the virus type accumulates these changes, but it doesn't make the changes itself.
No they can reproduce if they come across a host cell but cannot respond to their environment
Yes, viruses are very good at adapting to their environment to ensure their survival.
Italics is cool!Obama = Terrorist
yes.It does make sense.
warm, and wet areas.
Certainly not. It is a hotly debated subject. Viruses (and prions for that matter) are not alive in a conventional sense.
their tongue
viruses do not grow, and viruses do not respond to changes in their environment. Therefore, viruses are not living organisms. All living things reproduce, but Viruses need living cells to reproduce because Viruses cannot reproduce by themselves.
There are a few different ways in which a roly poly can sense in their environment. Roly polys use their feet for example.
This layer is called a capsid. The viruses without one are called naked viruses. The naked virus is can be damaged more readily by things in the environment.
messin up ur computa lol