viruses do not grow, and viruses do not respond to changes in their environment. Therefore, viruses are not living organisms.
All living things reproduce, but Viruses need living cells to reproduce because Viruses cannot reproduce
by themselves.
because...
Yes. Viruses are made of the same substances that living organisms are.
Influenza are a virus type.They do not have cells
Viruses only infect living organisms and since they are not alive, they can not infect other viruses. The question is interesting though.
This is (generally) referring to a VIRUS particle. Viruses can reproduce (a characteristic of living organisms) but may also be crystallised (a characteristic of non-living organisms). For this reason, a good number of scientists prefer not to talk of a virus as a living thing and even find discord classifying it under the normal taxonomic concepts and rules.
Of course they have. Only some virus lack them
No. It is nonliving.
Fungi
Of all these things, the virus is the only non-living thing. Viruses are not living organisms. E.coli is a bacteria and living.
Virus' are not living - they cannot exist outside a living organism, and therefore cannot be classified in the same way as other organisms
Bacteria are prokaryotes. Viruses are not living organisms, virus is a virus, that is all.
Virus
There is debate over whether a virus is a living organism or not. Like organisms it evolves, reproduces but a virus does not have its own metabolism.
it is not made of cells (A+)
Yes. Viruses are made of the same substances that living organisms are.
Influenza are a virus type.They do not have cells
Virus can not be termed as a living thing or organism. Viruses can not replicate themselves, they are dependent on its host. The only similarity is it contain genetic material such as DNA or RNA like living things which codes for its proteins.
Virus is neither a plant nor an animal it is actually in between living and non-living organisms. but it is been classified under botany.