sometimes
Blood rite of passage into man hood,
because it was introduced by colonialist invaders.
Vincent Crapanzano has written: 'Rite Of Return: Circumcision in Morocco'
circumcision is a Jewish religious rite that doctors generally advice against. It has no advantage to the person that has been mutilated in this way on the contrary there are serious health risks and disadvantages as a result of this ritual.
Very few' As circumcision is a Judaic religious rite that has spilled into the Islam world as well. There is no reason for circumcision and there is no religious compunction in India to engage in this sort of mutilation.
The answer is milah.It's five letters, ending in H. Milah is the Jewish tradition/rite of circumcising males at eight days old.
The word rite is a noun. The plural form is rites.
The idea of circumcision is to remove only the lose tubular piece of mucosal skin known as the prepuce or foreskin. leaving the rest of covering skin of the penis and frenulum alone. However in the case of infant circumcision this is not so easily achieved as a newborns penis is so small. The result should be to leave the glans penis totally unprotected and exposed to the elements. This form of male genital mutilation is a religious and cultural rite. any medical benefit is denied by all major medical schools and organisations.
The word brith typically refers to the Jewish rite of circumcision which is normally performed on children that are eight days old. Brith is counted as a scrabble word.
Khatna, or Khitan is the rite of circumcision. According to tradition Muhammad was born without a foreskin. Whether that was true or not, most Arabian tribes were already practicing circumcision, including pagans, Jewish tribes, and Christians. Like in other faiths of that day, cleanliness and purity were considered virtues, and so was self-denial. There were also the Old Testament writings to, and Muslims consider themselves a part of the Abrahamic covenant, and Abraham was supposedly given the rite of circumcision from God.
There is nothing important about circumcision. As a mater of fact it is a risky operation carried out on children who are not in a position to object to being mutilated as a result of a religious rite. Nature has made the penis the way it is because that way it works best. the perverse religious customs of the Jews and Muslims are nothing short of child molestation for the sake of religion. there are no good outcomes in circumcision unless there is some sort of disorder. These are however rare. It is interesting to note that if someone touches a child to satisfy some sort of sexual urge then he is a pervert and a villain of the worst kind. However if an adult actually slices a piece of a child's sexual anatomy to satisfy a religious urge, what should they be called?
you cant