Is circumcision wrong or bad

Answer 1

Circumcision is the removal of an important art of the genitalia There is no benefit to health in so doing. If someone so much as touches the genitalia of a girl with a knife or other instrument wit a view to taking bit from it it would be called Female genital mutilation. the same should apply to boys only it should be referred to as male genital mutilation.

Circumcision is not directly wrong or bad, most modern doctors do not perform it on babies anymore as there really is no point if proper hygiene is practised (cleaning the penis). Studies have shown that much of the penises nerves that are involved in sexual stimulation are located in the foreskin, so removal of the foreskin can reduce sexual climax. Circumcision does promote less bacteria growth as the foreskin is a hospitable place for growth of bacteria due to the moisture and heat. Removal of the foreskin can reduce the odds of a bacterial infection in the penis, though this effect can also be achieved by proper hygiene of penises with foreskins.

Many cultures circumcise for spiritual reasons, removal of the penis causes no destinct harm to the patient, so if the religion in question demands it, this is not bad.

Many people (even some doctors) claim that circumcision is wrong and vice versa, though these claims are generally unfounded. There is no distinct benefit to removing the foreskin, though there is no distinct harm in removing it either.