answersLogoWhite

0

The argument is flawed because it assumes that the emotional impact of art is solely derived from its color palette. While some of Jamie's paintings may not contain blue, they could still evoke feelings of sadness or melancholy through other elements, such as composition, subject matter, or emotional context. Thus, the presence of blue is not a prerequisite for the emotional response described.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is argument based on mathematics?

In an argument based on mathematics the conclusion is claimed to depend largely and entirely on some mathematical calculation or measurement.


Did Cezanne hide the letter C on his unsigned paintings?

No experts have claimed this.


What is Trade Practices?

Having customers pay for something and delivering a product that it not entirely what you claimed it would be. It may be entirely legal, but it may not be ethical.


What is deceptive trade practice?

Having customers pay for something and delivering a product that it not entirely what you claimed it would be. It may be entirely legal, but it may not be ethical.


Charles beard argument against the Framers?

he claimed that the Framers were rich people who wrote the Constitution to benefit themselves


Who did Robert Hook famously have an argument with?

Robert Hooke famously had an argument with Isaac Newton over Newton's theory of gravitation. Hooke claimed that Newton's ideas were similar to his own, leading to a dispute between the two scientists.


When you buy car insurance if you make a mistake about your age are you covered?

It depends on the 'mistake' you made. If you have claimed to be 51 when you are 50 years of age then they would probably accept that. If you have claimed to be 18 when you are 16 that is a different matter entirely.


If Hitler was Catholic or christian why did he kill Catholic Priests and nuns?

The simple answer is that no matter what he may have claimed to be, he clearly was not a Christian by any reasonable definition of the term.


Why did Frida Kahlo not consider herself a surrealist painter?

She cannot answer this question any more. What makes a painting surrealistic can be a matter of opinion.


How many paintings did Rembrandt van Rijn paint?

Opinions vary. It was originally claimed that he made over 700 paintings, but the Rembrandt Research Project reduced this number to around 250. Museums often claim the higher figure. The debate about the authenticity of some of his works continues, and the attribution of many may never be settled. He also produced approximately 300 etchings, and 1400 drawings.


How do you identify a strong or weak argument?

A valid argument is one in which the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. An invalid argument is one in which the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. In invalid arguments, the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to.


Why were Otis Amber and Crow having an argument?

Otis Amber and Crow were having an argument because Crow accused Otis of sneaking around and eavesdropping on conversations. Otis denied the accusation and claimed he was merely passing by. The argument escalated due to their stubborn personalities and refusal to listen to each other.