cancer
diseases
antibiotics
Penicillin to start with was first tested on a London policeman it nearly saved his life but they did not make enough.
It causes various diseases in human body.
Using animal testing and also using human cells xx
No it can not.
Currently only stem cells for diseases of the blood are available. Others are in testing mode.
Currently only stem cells for diseases of the blood are available. Others are in testing mode.
Genetic factors may predispose human beings to certain metabolic diseases.
Animals are used because scientists want to spare humans. Most animals have similar genes to humans so animals give the same reaction humans would if the experiments were being tested on the humans. Using animals is a way to help keep the human population up and still be able to find cures for those everyday diseases.
Arguments for: Testing on animals can provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of new drugs and treatments, ultimately benefiting human health. It can also help scientists understand biological processes and diseases that can't be replicated in other models. Arguments against: Using animals for tests can be viewed as unethical due to the suffering and harm inflicted on them. There are also concerns about the reliability and relevance of animal models to human biology, leading to potential inaccuracies in research outcomes. Additionally, advancements in alternative testing methods are making animal testing less necessary.
Yes, genetic diseases or disorders can be diagnosed using small blood and saliva samples. Genetic testing can analyze DNA from these samples to detect mutations associated with certain conditions. This can provide valuable information about an individual's genetic predisposition to certain diseases.
Functional genomics can speed up the design and testing of new medications by using an organism's genome and use of gene's to diagnose diseases and test how new medications would react with certain genes and types of organisms.