he asks what they are going to do about the snake-thing(the beastie)
The Littlun with the birthmark raises the question of the existence of the "beast," expressing fear and concern about a mysterious creature that he believes may be lurking on the island. His anxious inquiry highlights the children's growing fears and the tension between their innocence and the darker aspects of their environment. This question serves as a catalyst for the group's descent into chaos and savagery, reflecting their loss of innocence.
they are both cartoon artists.
they are both cartoon artists.
i dont know whpo is missing
I'm not sure. Why would you ask such a question? That would be my question for you to say.
In "Lord of the Flies," the wild boar does not specifically eat the littlun with the mulberry-colored birthmark. Instead, the boy goes missing after the boys' frenzied dance and chant during a hunting ritual, which leads to the assumption that he may have fallen victim to the chaos of their descent into savagery. The boar symbolizes the primal instincts awakening within the boys, but it is the group’s brutality that ultimately contributes to the littlun's fate.
In "Lord of the Flies," the mulberry-colored littlun, often referred to as the "littlun with the birthmark," goes missing after a fire spreads on the island. It is implied that he perished in the blaze, highlighting the tragic consequences of the boys' descent into chaos. His disappearance serves as a poignant reminder of innocence lost and the darker themes of the novel.
In Lord of the Flies only one boys is mentioned as having a birth mark. The littlun who first raises the issue of the snake-thing is described as having one side of his face blotted out by a mulberry-coloured birthmark. Piggy noticed that the same small boy had disapeared at the end of chapter two, when sparks from the fire on the mountain top set alight to a pocket of jungle on the side of the mountain.
Of course! everybody has a birthmark! What a dumb question!
In Lord of the Flies the littlun with the mulberry coloured birthmark on his face raises two question. Firstly he asks what the boys intend to do about the snake-thing. Secondly he also asks will it return the coming night.
He raise fear for evryone!!! not sure though. He tells every1 to fear the beastie =) he is a symbol of doubt and fear because then every1 thinks there is something out thereAnother answer: In the text of the book the littlun with the mulberry coloured birthmark on his face raises two question. He asks what the boys intend to do about the snake-thing and also asks will it return the coming night. Symbolically he raises other issues, such as why didn't anyone even know what his name was and why was the exact number of boys never determined?Why did nobody bother to find out his name? The very fact that he had a mulberry coloured birthmark meant that he was noticed but nobody asked him for his name. Perhaps the fact that he had a birthmark somehow lessened his importance to the other boys, his disability somehow made him invisible. I suppose that he is an example of societies atitude towards disability.In the text of the book the littlun with the mulberry coloured birthmark on his face raises two question. He asks what the boys intend to do about the snake-thing and also asks will it return the coming night. Symbolically he raises other issues, such as why didn't anyone even know what his name was and why was the exact number of boys never determined?EDITActually, none of the littluns are named throughout the book because of their lack of importance. The significance of the mulberry birthmark was so that the boy was noticeable, rather than ignored. The distinguishable birthmark is what makes Piggy notice that the young boy has gone missing after the first fire which they fail to control - he's killed in the fire and therefore the first character death, followed by Simon and Piggy.SOURCESStudied at GCSE English.
they all die. Littlun with birthmark - in fire simon - murdered by the savages piggy - knocked off castle rock by roger's boulderThe boy with the birthmark doesn't die...... The boy with the birthmark, and Simon both die as a result of the savagery and lack of civil behavior of the boys. The boy with the birthmark dies because the boys had no sense of order and had not counted how many boys there were on the island.He was simply forgotten about and it is assumed that he dies. In Simon's case, he is murdered by the boys in a brutal onslaught. This is a display of the degree at which the boys have lost touch with reality and have indeed become savages.The death of both boys is also denied afterward by most of the boys. They do not wish to admit to their behavior. This shows that the boys still have a sense of wrong and right but the desire for blood-lust and uncivil behavior has taken over. They all are considered outcast amongst the rest of the children. Absolutely nothing, as the littlun with the mulberry coloured birthmark on his face isn't even mentioned until chapter 2. What all three of them eventually have in common is that, presumably, all three of them died. Simon was beaten to death when he was mistaken for the 'beast.' Piggy was killed when he was knocked from the causeway by a boulder and the littlun with the birth marked face disappeared after the first fire got out of control, presumably killed by the fire or by smoke.