Back then people didn't know about dyslexia so nothing would really happen, but the person wouldn't be seen as smart as one without if he actually went to school and tried to learn to read. Of course most people couldn't read anyway so it didn't matter. A dyslexic person, unless he worked as a typesetter, would probably not be noticed.
A bad speller would not be noticed even if he was a typesetter. Looking at the spellings in the print copies of Shakespeare's plays showed that there were not accepted spellings for words--you could spell the same word two or three different ways in the same sentence and people wouldn't care. Makes it hard to read though.
Probably not. He or she may be the best speller in class. Calling them the best speller in the world would be an example of hyperbole.
It is said that the person who disturbsShakespeare'sgrave would be cursed.
Dyslexia is a noun (the condition).The adjective would be "dyslexic."
Um it would maybe a dumbo. To: Dumb Speller. From: Smart Speller.
i would say about 34 people that will have dyslexia
Yes, you would get soaked.
Google the Cerebellum Center.
An easy explanation for a child would be that dyslexia is a learning problem some children have. Dyslexia makes it hard to read and spell. The problem is inside of the brain and it does not mean the person is stupid.
It would just be considered dyslexia if you could not read. If you were dyslexic and had a hard time reading books you would have an equally hard time reading math equations. There is no type of dyslexia that is just about reading math problems.
They would heckle the actors and throw fruit.
you're a terrible speller...and i would suggest typing "earth" on google. lol
Well for starters people with dyslexia would be best. There are also the people who diagnose one with a learning disability, one that specializes in dyslexia would be best. So seek out a learning specialist it's their job to know about things such as dyslexia.