If you actuall meant to say Why should... then its for the smae reason everyone else has kids, but if you meant How should... they probable should adopt or, if its a guy, have his wife have an embryo inserted.
Of course they should. If everyone who had a disease did not have children, it would mean a huge amount of people never having children, which would affect the population. A person who has a disease can still have perfectly healthy children, as not all diseases are genetic. People who have diseases can make major contributions to society, as can their children. Even if the disease does get passed on to children, this can help scientists who are looking for ways to treat and even cure the disease. For these and many, many other reasons, like discrimination, of course people with diseases should have children.
Due to lack of sufficient medical study, goldenrod should be used with caution in children, women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, and people with kidney disease.
People with STDs should not have sex and should inform their partner of their disease.
no
yes, they should people don't need to be married to have children . adopted or there own.
Children should be told not to play with stray cats or make cats angry.
Children with measles should never be given aspirin, as this has caused the fatal disease Reye's syndrome in the past.
No.
As long as the 'health defect' isn't a communicable disease - there's absolutely no reason why not !
No, Because Zhu Zhu Pets have been told to have a disease on younger children.
You should maintain a healthy diet and exercise regularly to help heart disease in young people. A diet low in fat and sodium and high in fiber can help heart disease.
All parents should have their children vaccinated for polio. Polio is a devastating disease, and there is no cure, but with the vaccination, it can be prevented.