Because of these points... :
Although the Peasants revolt was very good for people in England, the Black Death affected people out of Britain because the terrible disease spread around the whole world.
The Black Death had a bigger impact, as it affected as many people as 75 million, but the Peasants revolt killed an average of 3267 people.
If it wasn't for the Black Death, there wouldn't have been a Peasants revolt, because so many deaths caused by the Black Death led to the peasants revolting.
The Black Death had a bigger impact on more peoples lives because many people died and the peasants felt they were worth more so they rose against authority to gain freedom from their lords and to see if they could gain more power and improve their lives forever.
the black death and the war with France
The Black Death because this disease contributed to why the peasants revolted.!!!
Because many people died of it. It caused the end of the mongol empire and caused the peasants revolt in 1381?
The Black Death caused the death of many peasants so they were in higher demand but there was less supply. The landlords had to pay the peasants more to keep them but eventually the government passed a law, i can't remember the name right now, which stopped peasants being paid more then a certain amount. This caused the peasants revolt. Trade declined after the Black Death as there were less crops, less traders and less peasants. Thanks!
There were three main causes of the peasants revolt. 1 - The poll tax: A new tax for everyone over the age of fifteen, which was five times the amount of usual tax. 2 - The results of the Black Death - Peasants had to do more work as there were less people because lots of people had died in the Black Death. 3 - Work service - Lords decided that if peasants wanted to rent land from them, they would have to work for a few days a week without payment or profit.
scientist dont really no but they are saying that it was carried by rats,lice,ticks,and animal dropping.they believe it was a form oof the bubonic plague.
Yes he was. That is why he took part in the Peasants Revolt in 1381. If he was a royal or if he was rich then he would be okay with the taxes (which were a problem at the time after the black death) and would be able to pay them.
During the Peasants' Revolt of 1381, the Archbishop of Canterbury was Simon Sudbury. He played a significant role in the events surrounding the revolt, particularly due to his attempts to negotiate with the rebels. Sudbury was ultimately captured and executed by the insurgents, reflecting the turmoil and tensions of the period. His death symbolized the broader conflict between the ruling class and the discontented peasantry.
because before the black death there were lots of peasants to do labour but after the black death since so many of them had died it was harder to get work from the survivng peasants so the lords offered the peasants higher wages
The Black Death
Before Black Death they had normal labor related work. After Black Death they had to clean the cities.
The Peasants' Revolt, also known as Wat Tyler's Rebellion, occurred in England in 1381 and was driven by widespread discontent among the lower classes due to oppressive taxation, particularly the poll tax, and harsh living conditions. The revolt was fueled by grievances over feudal obligations, social inequality, and the aftermath of the Black Death, which had drastically reduced the labor force. Led by figures like Wat Tyler and John Ball, the peasants sought to challenge the established social order and demand reforms, though the uprising was ultimately suppressed.