I would say happier like I'm a lot happier now not I'm more happy now. Hope this helps x
The phrase "more happier" is grammatically incorrect because "happier" is already a comparative form of the adjective "happy." Instead, one should say "happier" when comparing two things or "more happy" in certain contexts, though "happier" is more commonly used. Therefore, it’s best to say "happier" or "more happy," depending on the structure of the sentence.
No one is happier then Larry.
The "er" changes the meaning of happy to "more happy". "Mike is happier" means the same as "Mike is more happy". Happy is the root word, meaning joyous, and happier is the comparative form of happy, like happiest is the superlative form.
Assuming that you are capable of becoming any one of them, you need to figure out which one would make you happier. If more money would make you happier, then "doctor" would be a better choice, under the above assumptions.
The word may be one of these: happiest - (adjective) most happy, the superlative for happy and happier happens - (verb) occurs, takes place
The word happier has "er" added and increases the term happy to a greater happiness i.e. happy and then happier
The parakeets would much rather be with other parakeets, THEY ARE FLOCK BIRDS!!! However, if you have more than one parakeet, they will not bond to you because they are bonding to the other parakeets. The reason that parakeets bond so well is that they are flock birds and so if you make yourself part of their flock, they will bond very well. But if you are wondering what would make them happy, they would much rather be with other parakeets. A good parakeet site is www.lisashea.com/petinfo/budgie.html
well than you have to make a choice which one would you be happier with? Which one loves you more and which one do you love more I know this sounds cheesy but follow your heart:)
No they are not happy. Someone who is happy in their relationship doesn't have to prove it to anyone they just go on with their new lives. They still want you! ==NO== I would say they are more miserable than happy.This is probably to show certain someone what that person is missing and what a great boyfriend he really was.It is to prove a point.If he is with her but looking at you, I would say she doesn't mean much...but if he IS happy, you realize SHE is only one he sees than YES he may actually be happy.
Yes, usually, because both goods are desirable, so you would be equally happy (for example) with 5 puppies and 2 cats as you would be 2 puppies and 5 cats. If you connect these points, you will create a negatively sloped line. There are instances where the slope is positive because one of the options involved is undesirable. For example, if I have puppies and garbage. Now, I want more puppies, but less garbage. So, I may be equally happy with 2 puppies and 2 piles of garbage as I would be with 5 puppies and 5 piles of garbage. This is because the benefit of having more puppies is offset by the negative of having more garbage. This creates a positively sloped line. There are also instances where there is 0 slope or infinite slope if the quantity of a good is irrelevant to your enjoyment of it, like air. You would be happier with more puppies, but you would not be happier with more air. You would also not be less happy with more air. The amount of air is irrelevant to your happiness. This would be a zero slope line.
Chickens can be happy with or without a rooster. Roosters can provide protection for the flock and can help maintain order within the group. However, if a rooster is aggressive or stresses the hens, they may be happier without one.
Yes, but this is not the usual case. Usually, because both goods are desirable, so you would be equally happy (for example) with 5 puppies and 2 cats as you would be 2 puppies and 5 cats. If you connect these points, you will create a negatively sloped line. There are instances where the slope is positive because one of the options involved is undesirable. For example, if I have puppies and garbage. Now, I want more puppies, but less garbage. So, I may be equally happy with 2 puppies and 2 piles of garbage as I would be with 5 puppies and 5 piles of garbage. This is because the benefit of having more puppies is offset by the negative of having more garbage. This creates a positively sloped line. There are also instances where there is 0 slope or infinite slope if the quantity of a good is irrelevant to your enjoyment of it, like air. You would be happier with more puppies, but you would not be happier with more air. You would also not be less happy with more air. The amount of air is irrelevant to your happiness. This would be a zero slope line.