There has to be a balance between respect for life at all costs, and the reality of maintaining and using scarce resources for those who are healthy and/or those whose illnesses can be cured. It is a dilemma, and an ethical issue that we have not really solved at state or federal levels. Is it reasonable for us to maintain someone who is in a persistent and intractable vegetative state even if the vegetative state may last for many years? If someone is conscious but terminally ill and either in unbearable pain or in a medically induced coma, should a patient's desire to end the pain be recognized as a legitimate treatment given the physician's oath to 'do no harm'? Could it be argued that maintaining life while there is no quality of life whatsoever is really a form of doing harm?
complaints about physicians from patients,employees,or other physicians
it is against the law!
Demerol is a pain killer. t may be used to make a terminally ill person more comfortable.
get well soon
Ifi
Doctors treat diseases and research the causes of diseases. They take care of patients.
Some physicians who treat cancer recommend that their patients use marijuana to relieve nausea and vomiting.
It connects patients, physicians, and marketers.
Yes because it is their choice
It is usually used to relieve pain in the terminily ill patient.
It connects patients, physicians, and marketers.
They should, but politics and religion get in the way.