Being alive is certainly better than the alternative in the vast majority of cases. However, a pacemaker has nothing to do with the function of the kidneys.
The first internal pacemaker was developed in 1958 by Dr. Paul Zoll, who implanted electrodes in the heart to regulate its rhythm. However, the first fully implantable pacemaker was created by Dr. Arne Larsson in 1958 as well, and it was successfully used in a patient. These innovations marked significant advancements in cardiac care, allowing for better management of arrhythmias and heart conditions.
No, 90 is not too old for a pacemaker. Age alone is not a contraindication for the procedure; rather, the decision depends on the individual's overall health, the severity of their heart condition, and potential benefits versus risks. Many elderly patients can experience improved quality of life and better heart function with a pacemaker. Ultimately, the decision should be made by a healthcare professional in consultation with the patient and their family.
One is not "better" than the other - they will both perform exactly the same as a non transplanted heart or lungs. Neither will make the patient bionic or superhuman. A patient with heart failure would rather have a heart transplant than a lung transplant, and vice versa. It's whatever it "better" (more useful) for the patient, but neither hearts or lung transplants are "better" overall.
I think in-patient drug treatment id better than out-patient.
A demand pacemaker offers several advantages, primarily its ability to respond to the body's physiological needs by only pacing the heart when it detects a slow heartbeat. This on-demand functionality helps conserve battery life, extending the device's lifespan. Additionally, it allows for a more natural heart rhythm, reducing the risk of potential complications associated with constant pacing. Overall, demand pacemakers enhance patient comfort and promote better cardiac function.
yes i do think you would feel better if you had a pace maker put in. but only if you need one.
I think it would be excepted for hospice with stage 5 renal failure plus they take other conditions also it is like taking care of life stage ends making decisions that are very important in life and whats better for the patient they keep this in mind.
If you have a pacemaker, you need to hold the cell phone at least 6 inches away from your chest. Also the newer pacemakers are able to filter radiation from cellphones much better than the older pacemakers.
we have been very patient
Patient need is an important consideration when planning services that the clinic will offer because it will better enable the clinic to provide the appropriate services, allowing for a better patient experience. When scheduling patient appointments, considering patient need can make things run more smoothly for the patient and the physician/staff.
You can check identi medical articles to get a better understanding on this topic
CLIENT would be a better answer i think