u figure that question out and when u find it out then u tell me
Chlorine oxide would be a covalent compound, and not an ionic compound.
A compound containing sodium and chlorine in a binary ionic compound would be named sodium chloride.
No, magnesium and sulfur would not form an ionic compound because they are both nonmetals. Ionic compounds are formed between a metal and a nonmetal. Magnesium and sulfur would likely form a covalent compound instead.
The ionic bond is stronger.
Calcium would form Ca2+ and chlorine would form Cl-. The ionic compound would be CaCl2 to ensure a neutral charge for the whole compound.
When lithium and sulfur combine, they do so as Li2S (lithium sulfide). This is an ionic compound.
If fluorine combines with an element such that their electronegativity difference is more than 1.7, then they will form an ionic compound. Example:- Hydrogen fluoride is an ionic compound. Hydrogen has electronegativity of 2.1 and fluorine has 4.0. So, the difference is 1.9. Therefore, it is an ionic compound.
Ibuprofen would be closest, but aspirin is better
An ionic compound dissociated in water is an electrolyte and is of course more conductive..
Table salt would be classified as an ionic compound. It is composed of positively charged sodium ions and negatively charged chloride ions that are held together by strong electrostatic forces.
No, silver and copper would not form an ionic compound as they are both transition metals and tend to form metallic bonds rather than ionic bonds. Instead, they would likely form an alloy when combined.
Yes, silicon and chlorine can form an ionic compound called silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4). Silicon can donate its four valence electrons to chlorine atoms, resulting in the formation of a stable ionic compound.