· For access to raw materials
Because they were competing for markets and econimc stabalization in Africa.
S Africa was extremely useful for Britain as a sort of refueling station for British ships going to India to trade by the route around Africa before the Suez Canal was dug
Nationalism
Imperialism is when a country increases their power and wealth by bringing additional territories under their control. Before World War 1, Africa and parts of Asia were points of contention amongst the European countries. This was especially true because of the raw materials these areas could provide. The increasing competition and desire for greater empires led to an increase in confrontation that helped push the world into World War I
Of those three options, "Limiting American influence in Africa" is the least connected with European Imperialism, but it is worth noting that the others are also minimally connected . The US did not have any serious influence in Africa prior to the mid-1800s and was not attempting to strengthen connections between the US and Africa (especially after the US banned the slave trade in 1807). As a result, the Europeans were not worried about American influence in Africa to the extent that they would want to limit it."Population Overcrowding in Europe" led to an increased desire to settle other places, but it did not lead to imperialism per se. "Expanding the European slave trade" is also not really a reason for European Imperialism since, by the mid-1800s, most European countries had banned slavery, but as late as the early 1800s, a number of European countries were still trying to expand their African slavery networks.
for skilled wokers(;
Imperialism is the cause of the first world war. After napleon europes leaders tried to essentially put the egg back together agian, in doing so they created
Because they were competing for markets and econimc stabalization in Africa.
Henry Morgan Stanley's travels primarily aimed to explore and map uncharted regions of Africa, as well as to locate the missing missionary David Livingstone. While his expeditions contributed to Western knowledge of Africa, they were not a major cause of imperialism in the 1800s. Instead, the era's imperialism was largely driven by economic motives, competition among European powers, and the desire for new markets and resources, rather than exploration alone. Stanley's work did, however, indirectly support imperial ambitions by legitimizing European claims to African territories.
S Africa was extremely useful for Britain as a sort of refueling station for British ships going to India to trade by the route around Africa before the Suez Canal was dug
Nationalism
Imperialism was the result of a people's motivation for aquiring goods and/or resources that were available elsewhere. America imperialized the Phillipines for control of trade with the Orient. The British imperialized Southern Africa to posses the diamond mines there. The Russians imperialized Azerbaijan for control of its oil.
People who live in eastern Europe and cause alot of pollution. :L
Imperialism is when a country increases their power and wealth by bringing additional territories under their control. Before World War 1, Africa and parts of Asia were points of contention amongst the European countries. This was especially true because of the raw materials these areas could provide. The increasing competition and desire for greater empires led to an increase in confrontation that helped push the world into World War I
Of those three options, "Limiting American influence in Africa" is the least connected with European Imperialism, but it is worth noting that the others are also minimally connected . The US did not have any serious influence in Africa prior to the mid-1800s and was not attempting to strengthen connections between the US and Africa (especially after the US banned the slave trade in 1807). As a result, the Europeans were not worried about American influence in Africa to the extent that they would want to limit it."Population Overcrowding in Europe" led to an increased desire to settle other places, but it did not lead to imperialism per se. "Expanding the European slave trade" is also not really a reason for European Imperialism since, by the mid-1800s, most European countries had banned slavery, but as late as the early 1800s, a number of European countries were still trying to expand their African slavery networks.
cause it sucked
True, The end to European imperialism came about after the war.