Emperor Qin believed that unifying different states into one country required strong centralized authority and efficient governance. He emphasized the importance of standardized laws, currency, and measurements to create a cohesive society. Additionally, he advocated for the use of military force when necessary to maintain order and suppress dissent. Ultimately, Qin's approach combined administrative reforms with a willingness to employ power to achieve unity.
The same person, the Holy Roman Emperor
An emperor was a very important person in China.
Emperors do not "get" the rights to rule. Technically, they don't even have a right to rule, but they have a huge responsibility to the people they lead. Historically, people became emperor because they either inherited the position, or somehow had influence of the military. If the military will do what a person tells them to, then that person can control a country. People don't want to disobey the new "emperor" if he has an army that will punish them. And thus, he controls the people. If the military refuses to cooperate, he can claim to be emperor, but won't be able to control anyone.
They are called emperors, they have dominion over vast territories.
Government Emperor 1st. Emperor Taizu ----> this person was the first Emperor of Song dyansty. 2nd. Emperor Taizong 3rd. Emperor Zhenzong 4th. Emperor Yingzong 5th. Emperor Shenzong Find more information: ---> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Song_Dynasty
The same person, the Holy Roman Emperor
An emperor was a very important person in China.
An immigrant is a person from a different country who seeks refuge in another country.
An immigrant.
A person from a different country is usually referred to as a foreigner or an expatriate, while something from a different country could be labeled as an import.
Laws are different from state to state and country to country.
Liu Bang was the common person to become an emperor :p
yes it is different in every country there is a different miqat
It varied according to the laws of the receiving country.
She would be arrested for performing an illegal activity, i.e. driving. Just because an activity in Country A is legal does not mean than the person from that Country A is able to live according to Country A's rules in Country B. The person has to live acording to the rules of Country B and will be penalized according to Country B's laws for failure to comply. Conversely, if something is legal in Country B, but illegal in Country A, a person from Country A who goes to Country B can perform the activity without worry since only Country B's laws apply. Extraterriorality, i.e. having the laws of a different jurisdiction apply to certain people, does not exist except in certain areas under military occupation.
definitely not!
They're called ambassadors.