The success of the national government required the support of the propertied classes
Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr were bitter political rivals. Hamilton thought Burr was dishonest, disreputable and dangerous, which may or may not have been the truth, but was certainly Hamilton's belief. Hamilton developed animosity toward Burr when Burr won election to Congress, beating Alexander Hamilton's father-in-law, Philip Schuyler, who was the incumbent. Hamilton carried a grudge, undermined Burr whenever the opportunity arose, and was determined to ruin Burr's political career. Alexander Hamilton supported Thomas Jefferson because he hated Jefferson slightly less than he hated Burr. When the results of the election were finalized, Hamilton said, "At least Jefferson is honest."
A view that was not held by Alexander Hamilton was a strong belief in states' rights and limited federal government power. Hamilton was a champion of a strong central government and believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution, which would allow for expansive federal powers.
No, he was not. In all his writings, he never mentioned or discussed freemasonry. Certain masonic scholars have gone through the records of masonic lodges to see which Founding Fathers were involved, and Alexander Hamilton was not one of those members. Alexander Hamilton was also in totally opposition to the bill of rights and pro Federalist or imperial dictatorship. You can read this from his own works "The Federalist papers" The belief of the other founding fathers was in keeping the Republic of the United States of America as individual states to prevent a totalitarian government or monarchy from taking over. where as the federalist wanted a single federal government and no individual rights like freedom of speech. Taking away individual sovereignty is not a masonic view.
I believe that Alexander Stephens was a practicing Roman Catholic ... I am researching the question myself, and came across this website from a google search. Will check back in if and when I am able to determine for sure. Deo Vindice :)
Hamilton was fatally shot by Aaron Burr in a duel. Contrary to popular belief Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel, not the other way around. Burr thought Hamilton to be the sole detriment to his public career. Without Hamilton, he reasoned, he could achieve greatness. On July 11, 1804, he shot Hamilton. Although historians today still argue about what actually happened on the ground, it's clear that Burr's shot, which came with such force that it ricocheted in Hamilton's stomach, splintering a vertebrae, proved mortal. Hamilton died 31 hours later of those injuries, on July 12. Burr was indicted for murder in New Jersey, but the charges were dropped. However Burr would later be charged with treason...but that's another day's story.
Alexander Hamilton was a brilliant administrator and financial wizard who played a key role in shaping the early United States government. However, his reputation was tainted by accusations of corruption and doubts about his commitment to democracy due to his preference for a strong central government and elitist attitudes.
Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr were bitter political rivals. Hamilton thought Burr was dishonest, disreputable and dangerous, which may or may not have been the truth, but was certainly Hamilton's belief. Hamilton developed animosity toward Burr when Burr won election to Congress, beating Alexander Hamilton's father-in-law, Philip Schuyler, who was the incumbent. Hamilton carried a grudge, undermined Burr whenever the opportunity arose, and was determined to ruin Burr's political career. Alexander Hamilton supported Thomas Jefferson because he hated Jefferson slightly less than he hated Burr. When the results of the election were finalized, Hamilton said, "At least Jefferson is honest."
A view that was not held by Alexander Hamilton was a strong belief in states' rights and limited federal government power. Hamilton was a champion of a strong central government and believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution, which would allow for expansive federal powers.
This is true. Alexander Hamilton was a nationalist by belief and wanted a strong central government. As such, his economic changes were meant to fund the national debt and create a central bank.
The Federalists was a political party with a common belief in a strong nationalistic government, opposed to a government that held more power to the states, such as the Jeffersonians. The prime leader and brilliant brain of the Federalists was Alexander Hamilton. This party was soon wiped out thanks to Thomas Jefferson and his successes, as well as Hamilton's unfortunate death.
Alexander Hamilton believed that a strong national government was essential for uniting the country and ensuring its stability and prosperity. He advocated for a robust federal system that would centralize power, allowing the government to effectively manage economic policies, maintain order, and promote national interests. His financial plans, including the assumption of state debts and the establishment of a national bank, aimed to create a unified economic framework that would foster national cohesion and trust in the federal government. Hamilton's vision was grounded in the belief that a strong central authority could better serve the collective needs of the nation.
Hamilton was fatally shot by Aaron Burr in a duel. Contrary to popular belief Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel, not the other way around. Burr thought Hamilton to be the sole detriment to his public career. Without Hamilton, he reasoned, he could achieve greatness. On July 11, 1804, he shot Hamilton. Although historians today still argue about what actually happened on the ground, it's clear that Burr's shot, which came with such force that it ricocheted in Hamilton's stomach, splintering a vertebrae, proved mortal. Hamilton died 31 hours later of those injuries, on July 12. Burr was indicted for murder in New Jersey, but the charges were dropped. However Burr would later be charged with treason...but that's another day's story.
Alexander Rofe has written: 'The belief in angels in the Bible and in early Israel'
No, he was not. In all his writings, he never mentioned or discussed freemasonry. Certain masonic scholars have gone through the records of masonic lodges to see which Founding Fathers were involved, and Alexander Hamilton was not one of those members. Alexander Hamilton was also in totally opposition to the bill of rights and pro Federalist or imperial dictatorship. You can read this from his own works "The Federalist papers" The belief of the other founding fathers was in keeping the Republic of the United States of America as individual states to prevent a totalitarian government or monarchy from taking over. where as the federalist wanted a single federal government and no individual rights like freedom of speech. Taking away individual sovereignty is not a masonic view.
I believe that Alexander Stephens was a practicing Roman Catholic ... I am researching the question myself, and came across this website from a google search. Will check back in if and when I am able to determine for sure. Deo Vindice :)
Hamilton was fatally shot by Aaron Burr in a duel. Contrary to popular belief Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel, not the other way around. Burr thought Hamilton to be the sole detriment to his public career. Without Hamilton, he reasoned, he could achieve greatness. On July 11, 1804, he shot Hamilton. Although historians today still argue about what actually happened on the ground, it's clear that Burr's shot, which came with such force that it ricocheted in Hamilton's stomach, splintering a vertebrae, proved mortal. Hamilton died 31 hours later of those injuries, on July 12. Burr was indicted for murder in New Jersey, but the charges were dropped. However Burr would later be charged with treason...but that's another day's story.
Alexander Hamilton admired the British constitution for its balance of powers and the stability it provided, which he believed were essential for a functioning government. He appreciated its ability to combine elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy, creating a system that could adapt and endure over time. Hamilton viewed this blend as a safeguard against tyranny while promoting effective governance, making it a model for the fledgling United States. His belief was that this structure would help secure liberty and maintain order within a diverse society.